Originally Posted by TheKillingJoke
^ Well one can take this article as "proof" - and personally I do believe what's being stated in the article - but someone with a certain amount of skepticism would just dismiss this article as another news bulletin based on some truth and some speculation.

What I'm trying to say is: how you gonna determine what's "proof" and what's not?

It's extremely annoying when you call out other commenters for proof - implying they're telling a bunch of bullshit as a rule - if something is stated that doesn't fit your agenda.


Thanks to Snake

April 2000
Gambling
Anthony Dote
Donald Scalise
Carl Dote
Francis Mazza
Jack Cozzi
Frank Adamo
Sherman Goldman

January 2001
Fraud
Michael Spano, Sr.*
James Inendino*
Emil Schullo
Peter Volpe
Gregory Ross

February 2002
Gambling
William DiDomenico
Nicholas Malizzio
Natale Saraceno
Anthony Orlando
Dimitrios Fotopoulos
James DiGiulio
Phillip Coleman
Gerald Lenza

April 2002
Gambling/Money Laundering
Phillip Cozzo
William Shlifka
Michael Riccio
Steven Mariani
Carmen Trombetta
James Sarno, Sr.
Rosario DiMarco
Sam Lenoci
James Prebis

April 2005
Racketeering
Nicholas Calabrese*
James Marcello*
Joseph Lombardo*
Frank Calabrese, Sr.*
Frank Schweihs*
Frank Saladino
Paul Schiro
Michael Marcello
Nicholas Ferriola
Anthony Doyle
Michael Ricci
Thomas Johnson
Joseph Venezia
Dennis Johnson

June 2006
Tax Evasion
Rocco Lombardo
Richard Rizzolo
A bunch of other people

March 2010
Labor Racketeering
Rudolph Fratto*
William Degironemo

January 2011
Conspiracy to Commit Robbery
Joseph "Jerry" Scalise
Arthur Rachel
Robert Pullia

July 2013
Extortion
Michael "Mickey" Davis
Paul Carparelli
Frank Orlando
Mark Dziuban
George Brown
Vito Iozzo
Robert McManus

July 2014
Racketeering
Robert Panozzo
Paul Koroluk
Robert Panozzo, Jr.
Maher Abuhabsah
Maria Koroluk

May 2017
Labor Racketeering
John Matassa, Jr.*