^ Well one can take this article as "proof" - and personally I do believe what's being stated in the article - but someone with a certain amount of skepticism would just dismiss this article as another news bulletin based on some truth and some speculation.

What I'm trying to say is: how you gonna determine what's "proof" and what's not?

It's extremely annoying when you call out other commenters for proof - implying they're telling a bunch of bullshit as a rule - if something is stated that doesn't fit your agenda.