Originally Posted by BensonHURST

Originally Posted by SoCalGangs
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
Originally Posted by SoCalGangs
Gang members can’t testify against each other without being labeled a snitch, but they can usually get away with making a self defense argument if the victim ended up dead.


Ok but self defense to not get in trouble with L.E.
But the guys has immunity from being procured.

He would.hs testifying for the govt.
Not to claim self defense

He gave his story which I guess you can say wasn't snitching....

So if he was not going to testify?

Didn't SUGE have a real good chance on beating the case?




I’m not sure I understand what you’re asking exactly.

I’m no lawyer and I honestly don’t know the details of the Suge Knight case, I was just speaking in general to your other question about wether or not gang members can testify against each other, which is in fact snitching. Although I know of several local cases where a gang member used self defense arguments in court, and in some of those cases it actually worked.



This is what I am saying: Suge got into a fight with two other gang members, one is dead, if the 2nd refuses to testify and identify Suge to the jury, he should have a real good shot at beating the case??

Sounds like a good question for a defense lawyer.