I just explained where and how the 100 made men came from.
It is from the article about Buffalo is all but dead. Why are you NOT accepting my answer?
Because it's not accurate. They havent had 100 soldiers at any point in the recent past.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
See what's happening here you don't like my answer so ur not accepting it.
And vice versa.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
This is what S.C. is talking about flaming. I think.
You've lost me.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
--_______________________________________________ The pipeline.....
This is new?
So another family is in control of Buffalo in Buffalo? You never said that before?
Why the change of heart?
----------------------!!!!! See what I mean changing ur story?
What you have been saying and L.E. and media is that there are remnants still in place.
So you now don't believe the remnants are In place?
You believe another family kicked what was left of Buffalo out because they were too weak and Took control of the pipeline and territory ????
That's what r saying ?
That's a new one ?
This sounds like a theory?
I didn't say that at all. Read the post again. Stop flaming.
There are most likely still various remnants in place. I have said this before. I have never said anything otherwise. Stop lying, and stop flaming.
But the pipeline is a different story. I simply asked - without flaming - how a small group of elderly men could feasibly hold and protect a multimillion-dollar drug pipeline. Other organized crime groups, Italian or otherwise, would inevitably want a piece of that pie. And there are far more violent organized crime groups elsewhere in Canada and even in NYS.
So stop flaming and putting words in my mouth.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
You just said your opinions are based on fact like L.E.and and reputable media.
Show me?
See my problem here your not consistent with your last few posts.
Facts vs Theory
Not sure what you're asking me here? It seems you're just trying to incite an argument. What, in particular, do you want me to "prove?" I've never lied or misrepresented information, or made up bullshit like a variety of posters in this Buffalo argument.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
I am not really understanding your question?
About what L.E. here conflicting with Canada.
Let me remind you that the Buffalo field office was conflicting with the field office that that was involved in the Violi bust.
I don't remember which it is but this was spoken about on the forum in detail.
One FBI and 2 different positions on Buffalo _____________________________________________
What? If you could find that thread you are talking about that would be great because I can't really make sense of this post.
Originally Posted by BensonHURST
I can go on about the indictments but I tho k enough is enough
I think this is aggravating other members so I don't want to continue
Nikel knows way more than me.
He can certainly give you the info you want
But you're the one spouting the information. You're also the one with the theories, which you should be able to back up if questioned. You're the one misrepresenting and calling out the things I'm saying. You should be able to back up YOUR point, as opposed to putting it on another poster.
