You've left several comments on this site stating you're against gun control, not because of unintended consequences, like a retaliatory terrorist act, but because you don't want limitations on your personal access to guns.
Having established this, you eventually leave a comment citing the potential for a terrorist attack if gun control increases.
Your attempt to merely come off as some sort of third party prognosticator is pretty well overshadowed by your already well established personal stake in the gun control debate.
You not only sympathized with Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols and their actions, you issued a passive-aggressive threat, promising that similar actions would occur in the future if gun control increases.
"...the successful annihilation of organized crime's subculture in America would rock the 'legitimate' world's foundation, which would ultimately force fundamental social changes and redistributions of wealth and power in this country. Meyer Lansky's dream was to bond the two worlds together so that one could not survive without the other." - Dan E. Moldea
