It's been getting talked about more lately, especially with the rise of players like Steph Curry and it's a fair question: would Steph Curry be the player he is back in the 1980's/1990's? I don't think so. He's a great shooter, there's no way around that, but what you were able to get away with back then, I still don't think he'd be draining 30-footers with the ease he does in today's game.

In other news, is anyone else getting sick and tired of the Jordan/LeBron comparisons? That's all ESPN has been running during these playoffs. IMO, it's no contest, Jordan. LeBron's got some great numbers and has a chance to unseat Kareem as the all-time leading scorer, not to mention he could finish in the top 5 for assist leaders as well. Extremely impressive. However, LeBron's been on the wrong side of history with some of his numbers as well. Just in Game 1 of the NBA Finals this year, he became just the 6th player in Finals history to score at least 50 points. The difference with LeBron, he's the only one to have scored 50+ in a Finals game and still lost. In addition, LeBron has been to 8 straight NBA Finals between Miami and Cleveland. Again, extremely impressive. His record (granted if they lose this year as well): 3-5 (and 3-6 overall for his career). Jordan in the Finals: 6-0.