Wow this could be big, the Public Prosecution must provide more information about the deal made with Sonja in the trial against Holleeder. The prosecution must answer the question whether (and if so which) agreements have been made about the content of its statements.The court finds that the reliability of Sonja about her role as suspect of money laundering of her husband Cor van Hout and the sale of the Achterdam to third parties is important. Witnesses Sonja and Astrid Holleeder stopped in July 2016 with answers to questions about the legacy of Cor van Hout. Only from February 2017 did the ladies answer questions about this to the examining judge. Their story then turned out to differ from previous statements. The attorneys of Holleeder think their story is still very unbelievable and point out that the FIOD investigation concludes that the prostitution houses were not bought by Rob Grifhorst (as the ladies say) but by Johan 'De Hakkelaar' V. and Bertus H..