Phil Leonetti said it was Scarfo’s reaction to his youngest son’s suicide try that made him consider turning informant, which he did after they were convicted at trial.
Told of Mark Scarfo’s hospitalization at a point during trial, the father showed no emotion, Leonetti said.
“I’ve got tears in my eyes, and my uncle — this no-good evil (expletive) — has absolutely no reaction, no emotion, nothing,” he wrote in his book
Anyone else think Leonetti might be making this shit up to make Scarfo sound even worse than he is, and because it ties in to the self-serving narrative of his book and serves to justify his reasons for ratting and stealing Scarfo's money?
I get it. It might be true.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here.
I just wouldn't be so quick to automatically accept anything Crazy Phil says as gospel.
