Originally Posted By: CabriniGreen
@ Ivey
You can see how a guy gets confused by the arguments made here sometimes, I mentioned this awhile back. Do we respect Capeci as a credible source, THE credible source, or is he a hack who has people writing for him if he contradicts what we think?



Same sorta thing happened with Cefalu and Cali, I get confused a lot lol....


Capeci has proven himself to be one of the most informed and consistent mob journalists out there. Right up there with Raab or Robbins. Does that mean he's infallible? No. But he's more well informed and still has better resources than anyone on these forums. I don't care who they are.

Both the Amuso/Crea and Cefalu/Cali things were rather unusual. But it just goes to show that, once in a while, his sources may say different things and he's not afraid to point that out. That gives him more credibility in my book. And it really shouldn't be used as an excuse by every armchair expert on the forum to float their own theories, which they usually pull out of their ass.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.