So since we're using Newspaper articles, because you know, they get all their info from law enforcement which is always 100% legit. Are we just going to neglect the older article that GR mentioned in which Cammarano was mentioned as being from an opposing side of Palazzolo, who the article mentioned was Mancuso's latest attempt at retaining power, who at Mancuso's design was attempting to usurp the power of Cammarano, by meeting with Queens guys? The article implies he was seeking the backing for a move against Cammarano, this article mentioned Cammarano and those around him as having power. In the Asaro trial, Mancuso wasn't even named as boss at any point, it was Tommy DiFiore, whom law enforcement were calling the boss of the Bonanno's. So there you have two conflicting sources both coming from law enforcement. Yet because the law enforcement may have told the daily news, that Mancuso okayed it, we should believe it. Despite it being a complete contradiction from earlier reports, through the same exact paper?
Nobody said newspaper articles are always right. But even they have a better track record than the speculators on these forums. That's the main point more than anything. Some people on these forums are so quick to dismiss news articles or even the feds but they swallow what some nameless, faceless poster throws out hook, line, and sinker. That makes zero sense. Again, news articles aren't always right but why give Internet speculation the benefit of the doubt?
And nobody is answering to Vic Amuso, except for maybe Nicky Scarfo Jr.
This is a good example of what I'm talking about. You have no way of knowing that. Just more speculation.
