Read the articles, read the reports. I'm not stating he has no desire to be boss, the articles and reports do, and like I said, I doubt he even wants the spot, which means in my opinion, based off of those articles and my knowledge of Philly LCN in the past and where it is now, as incomplete as that current knowledge may be. And just look at the landscape, what mobster do you know in the past 30 years who came home, whether it was Philadelphia or elsewhere, where he was 80+ years old, fresh out of prison and appointed boss? He was given the spot he has for a reason. In fact, just to put an end to this, from guys like George Anastasia & Scott Burnstein there was speculation that Chickie would be named Acting Boss when he came home, out of respect. He wasn't. He got his sons position, in name only. Now if it was speculated by the likes of those guys that he would've been named acting boss out of respect, and it turns out he got his son's spot, in title. Doesn't that say he didn't want the position?

He's an advisor, all the articles have stated that he and those around him are comfortable with where he is now.

"Insulted" please. I simply used his exact analogy that he used when trying to tell me I'm wrong for stating the obvious. And you can't tell me I'm wrong for stating the obvious either. When there's an article, FBI report, a member who for a fact states Chickie Ciangalini is boss of the Philadelphia LCN, come back and say "I told you so.." prove me wrong. Until then, I don't know what to tell you, buddy.