This is the same dangerous argument Ivy. You can throw in all the 'buts' you want, its very dangerous ground.

What about the childrens cancer ward at your local hospital. What do they, have they ever contributed to society? Nothing but a financial burden for society. And most of them will just continue to do so then die.
Wouldnt society be better off without them?

Or are their deaths not a loss?

What about the old, the physically disabled? The mentally disabled? The sick etc etc?


Measuring life in monetary context is a slippery slope. One you dont want to go down.
No matter the 'ifs' or 'buts'.





I think thats best...