The criticism has merit because he used some pictures to accompany his articles?
No. When he states that Joey was in NY at Rao's and Joey's all geared up in winter gear and its July. That's suspicious and warrants skepticism.
I guess in your eyes that makes him the phony and fraud you have accused him of being.
Which I have never done.
Why is it that something written in print to you is beyond reproach or criticism?
Thank god you aren't a judge in a court of law, we would all be fucked.
As opposed to your blind acceptance?
Each to his own.
Edit: What Nicky said. Im out. Peace!
