It's always telling when the typical argument in support of gay parenting goes something like, "Well it's better than abusive druggies as parents." It's an admission the bar has to be set pretty damn low for a gay couple to actually look like the better option.
Doesn't have to be just drugs. It could be abuse, or violence, or neglect.
I don't see how you can justify not giving a child a good home simply because the caretakers are gay. I'm not saying that every child that comes from a broken should go to a gay couple, but should the circumstance arise, a young kid that needs a home and a gay couple is willing, why should there be qualms?
