Originally Posted By: slumpy

So you tell me which you think is more credible and more importantly why you think that? I see you guys talking about all this evidence that conclusively proves the officer is innocent of aggression. Okay, well, what is it? Where is it? I see everything here on this topic EXCEPT any evidence one way or the other.


The link to all of the Grand Jury evidence was posted two posts above your own. You might find the witness interview transcripts to be of interest.

"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."