Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
but I respectfully think you're both crazy. This is a slam dunk case.


Agreed. There is NO WAY he beats this case. To think a jury will buy "yea I was carjacked while I happened to be outside of a mob hit and I'm a mobster myself then the carjacker runs out of my car" bullshit is NOT going to fly with a jury. That is even laughable they even want to go ahead with that defense.

If I remember correctly didn't they even try tampering with a juror in the 1st case or was that the Ligambi trial? If it is this case that tells you how much they believe in that defense as well.