im not quite sure what your getting at, but for example in the nicodemo trial the defense was able to pass a motion to bar the prosecution from mentioning the mob because they didn't have any evidence that the crime had anything to do with OC, whereas in the firstplus trial there was evidence of mob involvement. but what it comes down to is the judges decision and your right majority of judges are far from unbiased .
And all I was trying to say was that the evidence was OVERWHELMING. They could have labeled them boy scouts instead of wiseguys and it wouldn't have made a bit of difference.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
