If he was really guilty of rape back then, then I think he should never have been free since that conviction.
On the other hand, somewhere I read he wasn't yet the family consigliere when Galante was killed, so why was he convicted on that count also? What was his role exactly in the Galante hit?
He just happened to be on the Commission when they were all charged. Him not being in a leadership position at the time of the Galante murder was noted but made no difference in the end as he still got nailed with the other racketeering charges. A sort of guilt by association.
