Are ya'll paying attention tot he spate of recent Supreme Court rulings. One today cited some of the President's recess appointments as unconstitutional. Thus, some of the decisions made by those appointees may be invalid and throws the effects of their decisions into disarray.

In addition, the Court ruled that Massachusetts' buffer zones around abortion clinics are unconstitutional. That ruling involves the intersection of several Supreme Court approaches to its rulings: least restrictive means; strict scrutiny; compelling government need. In other words, if government is going to restrict freedom of assembly and press, it better be able to illustrate a dang good reason.