Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: Ted
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
It's been proven with some of the recent cases that you can't win a trial solely on a rat anymore.

It all averages out in the long run. The Feds have been batting .900 at trial for the past 200 years. That's not going to change. They stack the deck in their favor, and they win.

But when it comes to murder charges, the Feds are around .500 in recent years. Even if Nicodemo flips, it'll still be tough to make a murder charge against Ligambi or Merlino stick.

Well, I'd have to see that on paper to believe it. Granted, in the high profile mob trials of the past few years they seem to be in a bit of a slump. But the Feds try hundreds of murders a year that don't make the papers, and I still think that it all averages out. They have too many tools in their arsenal and they don't play fair, so they'll always win a lot more than they lose.

As far as Nicodemo being a poor witness against Ligambi and/or Merlino, I have no idea. I don't pretend to know anything about that family other than the very public knowledge that they seem to be a running joke lately. But I do know something about the Feds and their tactics. So I was making more of a general statement than a prediction about Nicodemo. I don't know him, and I don't care whether he flips or not smile .

I meant Mafia cases, specifically. Most have ended with "guilty on racketeering, acquitted of murder". Bobby Glasses and the people around the Al Bruno murder (at least the one's that didn't flip) seem to be the only losers as of late.

Nicomedo seems f*cked, though.


"I die outside; I die in jail. It don't matter to me," -John Franzese