Originally Posted By: LittleMan
Originally Posted By: Dellacroce
Originally Posted By: furio_from_naples
I think that Amanda and Sollecito are guilty,because first he accused Patrick lumumba,after change idea.
Now if is only Guede that killed Meredith,;
Why Amanda and Raffaele don't stop him? And why they create a false burglary?
Why Amanda don't want to turn back to italy ?
If I'm innocent,I'll turn back to to prove my full innocence ?
even if they don't directly killed Meredith,are Guede's accomplices , however, and have to pay for it.

That's what I think Camarel

None of that is even close to proving beyond a reasonable doubt that shes guilty, in the US you probably wouldnt even get an indictment on that evidence let alone a guilty verdict.


Yes, some of the issues listed by Furio are why there are questions surrounding Sollecito and Knox's innocence- particularly the fake burglary and falsely accusing her boss. If you are guilty until proven innocent, then I would understand their guilt. However, in Italy, if you are innocent until proven guilty, then there should be more evidence for a murder conviction.

As far as Knox not returning to Italy for the retrial, I understand as per Italian law, it wasn't necessary. So, I'm confused how that could be used against her in determining guilt. I know I wouldn't return, regardless if I was guilty or innocent.

As far as why Knox and Sollecito didn't save Kercher, I believe they claimed that they weren't in the house when the murder occurred.


She's expected to use up her appeals, then it's necessary for her to return. The difference with Sollecito is that he is an Italian. Dellacroce is spot on, everything Furio said is circumstancial and i can't see how any of that could convince a jury of Knoxs guilt. I addressed all points except the parts about Knox returning to Italy, for that i have to ask why on earth would she? This doesn't point toward her guilt in the slightest, Furio i know you think she's guilty but say hypothetically she's innocent, and she spent 2 years in a jail for nothing, then that same country convicted her again, why would she return? She would obviously not have alot of confidence in that countries justice system.