I think that Amanda and Sollecito are guilty,because first he accused Patrick lumumba,after change idea.
Now if is only Guede that killed Meredith,;
Why Amanda and Raffaele don't stop him? And why they create a false burglary?
Why Amanda don't want to turn back to italy ?
If I'm innocent,I'll turn back to to prove my full innocence ?
even if they don't directly killed Meredith,are Guede's accomplices , however, and have to pay for it.
That's what I think Camarel
None of that is even close to proving beyond a reasonable doubt that shes guilty, in the US you probably wouldnt even get an indictment on that evidence let alone a guilty verdict.
Yes, some of the issues listed by Furio are why there are questions surrounding Sollecito and Knox's innocence- particularly the fake burglary and falsely accusing her boss. If you are guilty until proven innocent, then I would understand their guilt. However, in Italy, if you are innocent until proven guilty, then there should be more evidence for a murder conviction.
As far as Knox not returning to Italy for the retrial, I understand as per Italian law, it wasn't necessary. So, I'm confused how that could be used against her in determining guilt. I know I wouldn't return, regardless if I was guilty or innocent.
As far as why Knox and Sollecito didn't save Kercher, I believe they claimed that they weren't in the house when the murder occurred.
