jfk..continued....CRIMES COMMITTED...conspiracy to obstruct justice, conspiracy to obsturct a criminal investigation, witness tampering, destruction of crime scene evidence, violation of the texas statute calling for the autopsy to be conducted in dallas also constiutes a crime as well as the conspiracy to remove the president's body from the jurisdiction of the crime. the fbi and cia destorying, concealing and altering evidence contstitutes obstruction of an investigation, regardless of their intent. These are prosecutable crimes. A Conspiracy is a seperate crime unto itself. it punishes the wrongdoers for their active concealment of relevant facts and acts or omissions. The acting in concert, together, in secret, for an illegal purpose, is a crime regardless of whether the purpose is accomplished. The FBI, CIA and the Dallas PD are guilty as co-conspirators as evidenced by their conduct in picking members of the warren commission, investigators of the commission, and those who controlled what evidence was presented to the commission.

...LOOSE ENDS...let me begin...
..the fatal bullets fired by the "saftey net" of a trained agency sniper..from the dal-tex building made no noise...snipers, in particular after coming of age in WWII....and most specifically to black op operations...use high power scope rifles WITH SILENCERS....the fatal shots were never heard.

..the picket fence...eyewitness testimony is more reliable, the more witnesses you have that observe the same thing, at the same time and at the same location. Over 50 eyewitnesses ALL said they saw smoke, saw a rifleman or even heard a shot...from the grassy knoll....FIFTY. The warren commission ignored ALL OF THEM. many disappeared, or changed their story. This accumulation of eyewitness testimony cannot be ignored. The sheer number of witnesses, their location and ability to observe and their movements to the knoll area create monumental questions about the warren commission. in my view, they prove a second shooter, who may or may not have missed. Whatever the case, a second shooter rules out a lone gunmen.

medical evidence. the lack of original autopsy notes, which were burned by the naval pathologist, the lack of expert pathology photographs, which were seized by the secret service, the absence of the president's brain, at the direction of rfk, for whatever motive, and the botched autopsy have virtually obliterated the best evidence. Here, the body cannot speak clearly to us. If it doesn't prove a second gunman due to frontal shots, then it doesn't prove a lone gunman, as shot from behind cannot be confirmed. what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

A seasoned criminal defense lawyer would be able to poke holes, at this point in time, at the lone gunman theory, until hell freezes over, or when the CIA releases the balance of the assassination records it had sealed, whichever comes first.