it must be real hard for some to have to live with a decision that allows people to defend themselves with deadly force when the evidence backs them up. it comes as no surprise that the same people will keep narrowing the goalposts with these silly strawman arguments. lets constantly focus the attention on the fucking candy and clothing, both of which have been proven time and time again to have nothing to do with the defensive shooting case. why not take it a step further? lets project those same sets of false pretenses onto an entirely different situation in a vain attempt to both deflect and confuse dummies. question it and you are a racist. heh!