Another thing I found suspicious about his book is that the mobsters he mentions ALL had cases against them around the time and they were all over the news and papers back then. It would be pretty easy to just read the papers back then and plug yourself in to the plot. I don't remember him mentioning one guy who was on the street but NOT in the news. And the guys who were active but NOT in the news were the ones doing all the hustling and making all the dough. Does anyone else find it ironic that he doesn't mention ONE of those guys?

This guy reminds me of a dude who watched the movie Titanic and a week later started telling his friends how he was on a boat one time off the coast of Nova Scotia and hit an ice berg............. You get the idea.