As for the computer generated cartoon, the judge made an really stupid ruling. The jury will get an instruction that the cartoon is not "evidence" but argument only. Thats the same instruction they give regarding opening and closing arguments of lawyers. Point is the jury will see it, and they wont pay attention to the instruction, so it is as good as in.

The judge should have either admitted it or not admitted it.

I have not tried a criminal trial for more than 25 years, so I am not 100% sure but I believe the prosecution goes first, then the defense, then the prosecution gets a brief rebuttal, however there's a way the prosecution can screw up and not ghet their rebuttal, but I forget what that is.

Zimmerman will be resuming his patrols within a week, having never testified.