I am not going back through this thread but I will say that mere multiple witness testimony should only convict someone when the witnesses are credible. I don't care whether we are talking about mobsters or Michael Milken. If there is no hard evidence and there are 10 witnesses - all of whom are members of LCN or involved in a junk bond scam - it is highly dubious to award their statements sufficient creidiblity to find someone guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

I'm sorry Ivy, but Sammy Gravano was by his very nature a highly questionable witness. Was Gotti guilty of all the things Gravano said? Sure. But it is insane to think that he would have been found guilty solely based on that testimony. There were tapes in that trial. That is what got him.