Still waiting for an answer to my question: What would Iran have to do, if there's anything at all, that would make some folks here believe that military action was the only solution left?
The fact that those folks have not been able to answer this question tells me they've already taken military action off the table, if it was ever there to begin with. Which, in turn, kills their credibility on this issue all together.
Sorry but that makes no sense.
According to the best intelligence estimates, 2007, 2010 and currrent , Iran
does not have a nuclear weapons program. All the people calling for war seem to elide this fact. Talk about credibility. They have none. The people calling for war seem to be
living in a fact free world when it comes to this. They want war. Period.
The same people who lied us into war into Iraq are trying to do so into Iran.
Once again, into the breach!! If Iran attacks the United States, the United States will destroy Iran. Everyone knows that. It's unquestioned. The question is why are some people so eager to attack a country which has not attacked us? It's like we're living in a surreal world where this quote never existed.
"War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
