Olivant, all due respect, I think you're having a hard time being objective here.

Normally, you're the morals police here . For example, you're radically pro-life, yet you look at the (possible) sexual asaults of two women as no big deal? I find that a bit contradictory. And now that the subject matter involves your beloved Pittsburgh Steelers, you seem to want to give the guy the benefit of the doubt.

Now I'm not saying that Ben's guilty, but if it turns out that he goes out fondling women, then I'd say he does "have a problem," as Goombah suggests. Wouldn't you agree?