I just finished one of Lee Strobel's books about Christ: The Case for the Real Jesus.
One error that he (and others) continually make is equating the accuracy of historical and geographical information in the Bible and related texts with the accuracy of alledged supernatural events like the Resurrection.
The leap from the historicity of natural to that of supernatural events is unwarranted by any measure of logic or polemic. But for some readers it is probably a slight of hand that they don't pick up on.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
