It is Vincent after all, not Michael, who plans and directs the murders of the Archbishop, Luchese and that Swiss Banker Fuck.
Perhaps this is not the right thread for another "GF III is bad"-comment. But DT's remark about Vincent shows me that also from a mere storytelling perspective, GF I is much better. Vincent never had a doubt, he never refused the criminal life. So Vincent just doesn't have the weight for a tragic hero. (The story of Michael had been told already in GF I and II.)
