GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?

Print Thread

Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen? [Re: EnzoBaker] #480083 03/16/08 10:01 PM 03/16/08 10:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2003 Posts: 15,020 Texas O olivant
olivant O Joined: Feb 2003 Posts: 15,020 Texas	No. One source of the Trilogy's strength was its consistent use of the same actors to portray familar characters. Last edited by olivant; 03/16/08 10:01 PM. "Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	EnzoBaker	03/17/08 12:16 AM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	olivant	03/17/08 02:01 AM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	Danito	03/17/08 01:50 PM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	Sicilian Babe	03/17/08 02:04 PM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	Tony Mosrite	03/17/08 02:10 AM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	pizzaboy	03/17/08 01:28 PM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	Turnbull	03/18/08 01:45 AM
Re: GF III: Should FFC just have re-cast Tom Hagen?	dontomasso	03/18/08 07:31 PM