I’m not convinced, again if they knew they would’ve killed him or you’d have to say the whole perisco reputation as a dangerous no BS gangster is a fraud. Which I for one believe he was which is why I think the claim they knew is a face saving position.

On a side note I’ve said it before I’m not getting into what I know or don’t know, where I’m from, how I know this or that etc. Those of you who feel you have to question another’s opinion with by assuming that person doesn’t have the history you “claim” to have I find curious since I can be anyone I want and you wouldn’t be able to prove or disprove it. So if you disagree with me or anyone else fine. I really couldn’t care less but don’t question their experiences. Seems counterproductive to the conversation. Challenge there opinion. All in all I read a lot of comments from those “in the neighborhood” that just don’t make sense.