Mr Turnbull you are contradicting....!

Originally Posted by Turnbull
Originally Posted by Lana
If Michael takes the Fifth all his carefully planned strategy out the window, no response because of self-incrimination, legitimacy shot to pieces and a lot more!

I explained why Michael couldn't take the Fifth at the hearing:
Rocco linked to Michael

Yet you seem to be saying?
Originally Posted by Turnbull
If Michael had seen him [Questadt] there [Havana] he'd have taken the Fifth at the later Senate hearing

Whilst seeing Questadt as a member of the later Senate hearing committee, would have been a shock, I still can't see Michael taking the Fifth under any circumstances

Michael and Hagen towards the end of 1?
Originally Posted by Lana

  • What would Michael have done differently? though Nothing!
Michael in reality could never have taken the fifth amendment to the US Constitution

So Michael would still have lied under oath, denied all the charges and committed perjury
ie: It's up to five counts of perjury rap remains unchanged

Michael wanted to show that he has nothing to hide, nothing that would incriminate him
So Michael taking the fifth was never an option