No offense but this is a very weak argument. Do you know the history of other Vice Presidents and when they left the positions they held prior to becoming VP? Dan Quayle, the VP under Bush Sr didn't leave the Senate until Jan 1989. Four years later Al Gore did the same thing when he was VP for Clinton. Were both of those elections stolen as well? Those are two bipartisan examples but if you choose to look into it just a little bit you will find many more.
He said Trump is done. That was meant to tell him if he was, she would've resigned. And you ignore the part that Biden suddenly mustered up 81 million votes. The past three elections, roughly around 130 million people had voted. It's an anomaly where Trump gets even more votes than his first term and suddenly 155.5 million people have voted. 25 million people over usual numbers of these past 3 elections.
When Bush Sr won, even though there was no thought of election fraud, Dan Quayle didn't resign. When Clinton won, the election also was not in question, but Al Gore didn't resign until January either. What is different now? You are trying to make it seem like a peculiar, suspicious choice when I am showing you facts dating back SEVERAL elections, among both parties, that her resigning sooner would actually be the anomaly, not her staying in her Senate seat. You say I'm ignoring the point about the amount of voters, but you are ignoring hard evidence that immediately discredits your claims.
This was the biggest turnout in election history because people on both sides all felt extremely strongly about it. But we can leave the question of election fraud to the courts, where it has been laughed out repeatedly. It really is all over but the crying.
