0 registered members (),
132
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,321
Posts1,058,573
Members10,349
|
Most Online796 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: olivant]
#962590
01/28/19 01:31 AM
01/28/19 01:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Revis_Knicks
OP
Was: Revis_Island
|
OP
Was: Revis_Island
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
|
What could they have done differently in Godfather 3 to make it a classic like the 1st and 2nd? I thought the story was pretty good but just maybe not executed very well. Recast it; remove the incest storyline; reword some of the dialogue. I thought Andy Garcia was great. Some of the characters were a little boring to me though, I will say.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Revis_Knicks]
#962620
01/28/19 11:05 AM
01/28/19 11:05 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I think if FFC's original plan of having Winona Ryder play Mary had worked out, it would have made a huge difference.
Sofia Coppola was so terrible it kind of ruined what should have been a heart-rending conclusion.
It wouldn't have made GFIII anywhere near as good as the first two installments but it would have spackeled over a lot of the film's problems.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Revis_Knicks]
#962661
01/29/19 09:50 AM
01/29/19 09:50 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I didn’t even know she was in the running. James Caan said that FFC was going through a lot of problems in his personal life when he made the movie so that may have played a role too Yeah, she was actually hired but had some medical problems and had to drop out. They needed to fill the role on extremely short notice, so they ended up with the director's daughter instead of an actual actress.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: OakAsFan]
#962998
02/02/19 02:23 AM
02/02/19 02:23 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 757 Australia
Lana
The Hunted One
|
The Hunted One
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 757
Australia
|
Stone/s! in my shoe, among others - 1. No Tom Hagen [no brainer] 2. Weak and stupid Michael 3. Sonny's or even Connie's son/s as power struggle schemers instead of inventing Vincent I felt Sofia was alright especially compared to the performances of quite a few of the seasoned actors.... "The studio lowballed Robert Duvall" indeed Robert Duvall felt the pay gap between Al Pacino and him was unacceptable Robert Duvall-Seth Meyers interviewAl Pacino on The Godfather: Part III (1990) Al Pacino - Biography - IMDbunder 'Personal Quotes' - You know what the problem with that film is? The real problem? Nobody wants to see Michael have retribution and feel guilty. That's not who he is. In the other scripts, in Michael's mind he is avenging his family and saving them. Michael never thinks of himself as a gangster - not as a child, not while he is one and not afterward. That is not the image he has of himself. SPOILERHe's not a part of the [Goodfellas (1990)] thing. Michael has this code: he lives by something that makes audiences respond. But once he goes away from that and starts crying over coffins, making confessions and feeling remorse, it isn't right. I applaud [Francis Ford Coppola] for trying to get to that, but Michael is so frozen in that image. There is in him a deep feeling of having betrayed his mother by killing his brother. That was a mistake. And we are ruled by these mistakes in life as time goes on. He was wrong. SPOILERLike in [Scarface (1983)] when Tony kills Manny - that is wrong and he pays for it. And in his way, Michael pays for it.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Lana]
#963429
02/07/19 01:37 PM
02/07/19 01:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Revis_Knicks
OP
Was: Revis_Island
|
OP
Was: Revis_Island
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
|
Stone/s! in my shoe, among others - 1. No Tom Hagen [no brainer] 2. Weak and stupid Michael 3. Sonny's or even Connie's son/s as power struggle schemers instead of inventing Vincent I felt Sofia was alright especially compared to the performances of quite a few of the seasoned actors.... "The studio lowballed Robert Duvall" indeed Robert Duvall felt the pay gap between Al Pacino and him was unacceptable Robert Duvall-Seth Meyers interviewAl Pacino on The Godfather: Part III (1990) Al Pacino - Biography - IMDbunder 'Personal Quotes' - You know what the problem with that film is? The real problem? Nobody wants to see Michael have retribution and feel guilty. That's not who he is. In the other scripts, in Michael's mind he is avenging his family and saving them. Michael never thinks of himself as a gangster - not as a child, not while he is one and not afterward. That is not the image he has of himself. SPOILERHe's not a part of the [Goodfellas (1990)] thing. Michael has this code: he lives by something that makes audiences respond. But once he goes away from that and starts crying over coffins, making confessions and feeling remorse, it isn't right. I applaud [Francis Ford Coppola] for trying to get to that, but Michael is so frozen in that image. There is in him a deep feeling of having betrayed his mother by killing his brother. That was a mistake. And we are ruled by these mistakes in life as time goes on. He was wrong. SPOILERLike in [Scarface (1983)] when Tony kills Manny - that is wrong and he pays for it. And in his way, Michael pays for it. I agree with everything. But I really did think Vinny was a great character. Maybe they could’ve made him Connie’s son or Sonny’s son with his wife and not his mistress. But I didn’t have a problem with that.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Turnbull]
#963494
02/08/19 01:15 AM
02/08/19 01:15 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019 Texas
olivant
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019
Texas
|
No one. Several Dons attempted to have one of their sons succeed them, but none of the sons was anywhere near as successful as Michael. Looked at as a "stand-alone," Michael has no parallels in Mobdom. You might say that Joe Columbo, like Michael, attempted to make himself appear "legitimate," but that's where the comparison fails.
I'd like to hear from others on this board. Pretty much my opinion also. The Bonannos come the closest though to the father/son duo. Like Michael, Bill was forced into the life too early and probably somewhat reluctantly. However, once in, Bill's fortunes significantly depart from Michael's. One significant difference is Bill's hesitancy to strike back against Maggadino et al while Michael wants to jump right in: "We can't wait."
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Turnbull]
#963615
02/09/19 04:00 PM
02/09/19 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Revis_Knicks
OP
Was: Revis_Island
|
OP
Was: Revis_Island
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
|
I’m surprised more people within the Corleone family didn’t have a problem with Michael jumping all of them to be named boss just because he was the son of Vito. Obviously the right choice was made but I can see why some people might’ve felt like Michael was just a spoiled kid who didn’t put in enough work and didn’t deserve to be boss. Tessio was handled, maybe everyone in the family fell in line after that. No one would question Vito's choice, but the novel points out that many (in and out of the family) thought Michael put in "a bravura performance against the Turk and McCluskey," but he lacked "force." Tessio obviously carried that thought to the extreme when he betrayed Michael. I never read the novel. Maybe I should.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Revis_Knicks]
#963830
02/12/19 01:30 PM
02/12/19 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,822 Where ever needed.
DuesPaid
Banned
|
Banned
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,822
Where ever needed.
|
You're right, Oli. But, at the end of the day, Tessio threw in with Barzini because he didn't think Michael would win.
Underestimation is a major subtheme of the Trilogy. Vito underestimated Solozzo. Sol underestimated Michael. Sonny underestimated Carlo. The other Dons underestimated Michael. Michael underestimated Roth. Roth underestimated Michael. Michael underestimated Fredo. Michael underestimated Altobello. Vincent underestimated Mosca and overestimated The Twins...As Vito said; "Women and children can afford to be careless. But not men. Who do you think was Michael’s toughest adversary? Rocco.
Be Loyal, Be Loving, Be Quiet.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Turnbull]
#963939
02/13/19 09:49 PM
02/13/19 09:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
Revis_Knicks
OP
Was: Revis_Island
|
OP
Was: Revis_Island
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,300
|
Who do you think was Michael’s toughest adversary?
Roth, without a doubt. He was incredibly clever and resourceful. Gotta go with Roth too.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: olivant]
#977346
08/22/19 03:31 PM
08/22/19 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,393 Tampa, Florida
johnny ola
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,393
Tampa, Florida
|
How about this? The strong points in the GFI & GFII was the attention to detail in depicting the Corleone family in the past. GFIII, basically set in the present time. Just doesn't quite hold the same interest. One could make a case that I&II largely portrayed Vito and Michael in control despite the travails they faced. One had confidence that they would successfully meet the challenges they faced. However, in III, Michael's control seemed tenuous and the challenges he faced required help to overcome. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-IkWpm7TS0I got the impression that Michael finally got the point of being considered legitimate. "Kay, my father's way of doing things is over -- it's finished. Even he knows that. I mean in five years, the Corleone Family is going to be completely legitimate. Trust me. That's all I can tell you about my business". A promise he made to Kay upon his return to the USA. I think he wanted to just bask in the glory of being a philanthropist, especially with the Catholic Church. I read somewhere that FFC really didn't want to do a GFIII. He basically did it for the money to start his winery. I found many of the scenes in GFIII repeated from previous GF's i.e. the family group picture, family events wedding/first Holy Communion. This topic has been discussed many times in the past. The best opinion that I read was by itself it would have been a great film. It just had the misfortune of being naturally compared to the first two.
I love my Chrysler and tuna fish sandwiches.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: Revis_Knicks]
#978409
09/19/19 11:10 PM
09/19/19 11:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019 Texas
olivant
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019
Texas
|
Some, much, or perhaps all of III was forced. Whether FFC produced it for want of cash or pursuant to we fans' demands, or just because it seemed the thing to do, there was no natural storyline that FFC could follow as there was from I to II.
Maybe FFC figured that we fans would want to know what happened to Michael et all. If so, perhaps he could have produced a one hour documentary that answered our questions. Of course, he couldn't just do that; he had to try to produce an epic that at least attempted to emulate the previous two films.
You know, when I watch the documentaries on TV about the Mafia in the 30s, 40s, 50s (and even somewhat into the 60s), I have a certain feeling about it that is so different from what I feel when I watch a Mafia documentary about the 70s, 80s, and the present. Those latter decades documentaries (what they document) just seem so cheap by comparison. Gotti and Massino simply don't rise to the level of Luciano, Genovese, Costello, or Gambino.
Now, scum of the Earth are just that no matter during what decade they are scum. However, there was something substantial about the early decades' Mafiosi that recent Mafiosi can't even come close to. In I and II, Michael et al had that substance. In III, they just plain didn't. That's the big cognitive problem; we had I and II with which to compare III. III's plots were contrived. Murder is bad enough, but why or why incest?
So, what could have made III better? Maybe just don't make it.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: olivant]
#978454
09/21/19 09:49 AM
09/21/19 09:49 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
It should have been made more timely instead of Coppola hemming and hawing for sixteen years. For those of us old enough to remember, those sixteen years felt like an eternity. It's not like today where you get a sequel in a series every two or three years. Plus, I think it would have behooved them to set the film in the sixties rather than the late seventies. Throw in a different plot, maybe something akin to the Colombo war (the Rosatos, who were loosely based on the Gallo brothers, seemingly survived Part II), and let the Corleones win decisively. Pacino was quoted as saying that no one wanted to see a weak Michael, let alone lose his daughter. And he was right.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: pizzaboy]
#980990
11/15/19 04:37 PM
11/15/19 04:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 177 Westchester
Frankie_Five_Angels
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 177
Westchester
|
Could've started with better casting/luck. Eli Wallach as Don Altobello and Sofia Coppola as Mary, were just horrible decisions... Due to illness or not, they were just not believable in their roles. Thats what killed the movie for me.
"I'll give you undignified. Go fuck yourself. You, Phil... whoever. He's my fuckin' cousin."
"My name is George. I'm unemployed and live with my parents"..
|
|
|
Re: What could have made Godfather 3 better?
[Re: pizzaboy]
#980992
11/15/19 04:48 PM
11/15/19 04:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019 Texas
olivant
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,019
Texas
|
It should have been made more timely instead of Coppola hemming and hawing for sixteen years. For those of us old enough to remember, those sixteen years felt like an eternity. It's not like today where you get a sequel in a series every two or three years. Plus, I think it would have behooved them to set the film in the sixties rather than the late seventies. Throw in a different plot, maybe something akin to the Colombo war (the Rosatos, who were loosely based on the Gallo brothers, seemingly survived Part II), and let the Corleones win decisively. Pacino was quoted as saying that no one wanted to see a weak Michael, let alone lose his daughter. And he was right. PB, basically I agree with you especially about setting it in the 60s and basing it on actual mob events such as the Columbo and Bananas Wars. Letting the Corleones win decisively would have sealed it too by making Michael (regrettably) the family's savior.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
|
|
|
|