I provided 2 links to back up my statement that you said were false. Provide links to say my statement and the links I have provided are indeed false for starters.

Interesting that Trump is increasing defense spending, considering someone in here was saying Trump was anti-war. The buyer's remorse from anti-war libertarians has to be kicking in about now. I posted his short list for cabinet appointments, full of Wall Street people and Bush cronies. Draining the swamp? He just shoved a plug in the drain, and turned the same murky water back on.

Faithful 1 and Yates will post any irrelevant link and try to pass it off as evidence. I suppose they think by just using the url tags that somehow it puts an end to the argument.

Faithful 1's argument was that the media is liberal. This is an oft repeated myth by the right, never been proven with anything more substantial than anecdotal evidence. A bunch of right wingers watching the NBC Nightly news, hitting pause, then yelling, "Did you hear that? Right there! He said Bush never found the weapons of mass destruction. LIBERAL!". They'll post a link to some article written by one of these guys, and boom, evidence that the media is liberal. Hilarious. Never mind the fact that the media is almost entirely owned and increasingly consolidated by corporations. Not exactly a liberal bunch.

Yates posted evidence that people who voted for Trump previously voted for Obama, even though there is absolutely no way to prove this.

SCG,

Trying to argue that increasing defense spending doesn't equate to being pro war isn't an easy sell, is it? I don't envy you. Must be uncomfortable twisting up like a pretzel.

Ah, come on, SCG. Be a good sport. You spent the last 6 months telling us Hillary was the neo-con in this election. Turns out Trump's short list of cabinet appointments is filled with neo-con Bush cronies, and he's increasing defense spending. When he "bombs the shit out of ISIS" his first day in office, probably resulting in 10 times the civilian casualties of Shock and Awe. What will you say then? He was just testing the weapons?

The military is well funded. There is no reason for an increase,

In a recent interview with CBC News, Fat Mike spoke about the fear he had of a Trump presidency. “I get panic attacks nightly. All my friends do too,” Mike said. “Because who had any idea this idiot would get as far as he did? … I think he’s a bigger a-hole [than Bush] but I don’t think he’ll be a worse president because no one takes him seriously. Democrats hate him, Republicans hate him, the military hates him. Just a bunch of racist, sexist rednecks love him.”

Faithful 1 and Yates will post any irrelevant link and try to pass it off as evidence. I suppose they think by just using the url tags that somehow it puts an end to the argument.

Faithful 1's argument was that the media is liberal. This is an oft repeated myth by the right, never been proven with anything more substantial than anecdotal evidence. A bunch of right wingers watching the NBC Nightly news, hitting pause, then yelling, "Did you hear that? Right there! He said Bush never found the weapons of mass destruction. LIBERAL!". They'll post a link to some article written by one of these guys, and boom, evidence that the media is liberal. Hilarious. Never mind the fact that the media is almost entirely owned and increasingly consolidated by corporations. Not exactly a liberal bunch.

Yates posted evidence that people who voted for Trump previously voted for Obama, even though there is absolutely no way to prove this.

Trump was the right choice. Proud of this country for not letting one of the most corrupt politicians become president.

Well it's been fun to see the establishment's candidate go down in flames and watch the media snobs surprised reaction but to get realistic here even if Trump somehow did half of what he says he will do, our economy will not be much better off.

We're still due for a severe recession, and the timing for that is highly dependent on what the federal reserve decides to do with interest rates. How much influence will Trump have over what the Fed does is unknown. the Fed is supposed to be independent. And even if he does have any influence, there's no telling what he wants, as he's given mixed signals about the Fed and it's low interest rate policy, claiming they're being very political yet he's also said he likes low rates and would take advantage of them. Which indicates that he's ready to increase spending.

He's also promising to increase spending on defense and also domestic type spending to "create jobs" all while promising to cut taxes. Not good for our future.

All the trade deal talk and the protectionism isn't going to fix the the damage done by the Fed and may very well just do more harm. Deporting illegal immigrants will also have very little effect.

http://www.hannity.com/articles/hanpr-election-493995/donald-trump-saves-1000-jobs-15345024/

He is not even president and he saved 1000 jobs. Furthermore, the markets also reacted favorable to Trump.