GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
2 registered members (Blackmobs, 1 invisible), 66 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,618
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,285
Hollander 24,128
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,518
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,386
Posts1,059,760
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 109 of 141 1 2 107 108 109 110 111 140 141
Re: Election 2012 [Re: Skinny_Vinny] #673291
10/31/12 08:34 PM
10/31/12 08:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Just Lou
The count is up to 14 times Mittens has been asked about FEMA, and he just ignores the question.


That's a mistake.

Originally Posted By: Skinny_Vinny

Will this help Christie for reelection?


Said it before, but this sealed it.


Last edited by ronnierocketAGO; 10/31/12 08:36 PM.
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673293
10/31/12 08:43 PM
10/31/12 08:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
S
Skinny_Vinny Offline
Capo
Skinny_Vinny  Offline
S
Capo
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
I don't think any of this will changes votes next Tuesday for Obama/Romney or whenever Christie is up for reelection.

Keep in mind, here in Florida, I have not stopped giving out candy for three hours. Point is, people not affected are going on with their lives and not going to be swayed by what is happening in NY and NJ.

Hey Ronnie. Drudge is teasing a sex scandal involving the campaign is about to break.

Last edited by Skinny_Vinny; 10/31/12 08:44 PM.
Re: Election 2012 [Re: Skinny_Vinny] #673294
10/31/12 08:45 PM
10/31/12 08:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Skinny_Vinny

Hey Ronnie. Drudge is teasing a sex scandal involving the campaign is about to break.


Why didn't they run with that Biden, Iraq construction contracts piece I linked earlier?

Oh god, imagine a Biden sex scandal.

Let me get my vomit bucket.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673297
10/31/12 09:14 PM
10/31/12 09:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
M
Mist Offline
Associate
Mist  Offline
M
Associate
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
Romney and Obama are tied with Romney in a slight lead
Which I believe is promising for a Romney win.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: Mist] #673299
10/31/12 09:17 PM
10/31/12 09:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Mist
Romney and Obama are tied with Romney in a slight lead
Which I believe is promising for a Romney win.


They're sure not acting as confident.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: Mist] #673300
10/31/12 09:22 PM
10/31/12 09:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: Mist
Romney and Obama are tied with Romney in a slight lead
Which I believe is promising for a Romney win.


RCP has it as a tie which seems to be the average based on all major polls ( correct me if i'm wrong americans ) i'm predicting an Obama win from what i've read though i don't think he deserves it.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673301
10/31/12 09:35 PM
10/31/12 09:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
For God's sake people. Obama handled this crisis very well and I applaud him for it, but this doesn't have any effect on the outcome of the election. You are kidding yourselves if you think that.

People have made up their minds already. It's just about which group shows up to vote.

Last edited by 123JoeSchmo; 10/31/12 09:36 PM.

"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: Camarel] #673302
10/31/12 09:47 PM
10/31/12 09:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Camarel


RCP has it as a tie which seems to be the average based on all major polls ( correct me if i'm wrong americans ) i'm predicting an Obama win from what i've read though i don't think he deserves it.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html


We disagree alot (in fact most of the time) but me and Skinny agree on who will win. Difference only in EV score.

All this smoke in the air (mostly by the right) about how Pennsylvania and Minnesota and Michigan and whatever are really toss-up, well I consider them just that, smoke. I'm reminded of 4 years ago when Georgia and Dakota (North?) were talked up as potential Obama swing states...and while he had higher than usual non-redneck Democratic candidate voting % in those states (he lost Georgia by only 5), never once did I seriously consider him winning them from the polls I constantly read and compared at the time.

I do find it interesting the contrast between national and state polls, both which telling different stories. (On that note, National Journal's newest poll has Obama up by 5. Their last poll had a tie.)

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673303
10/31/12 09:52 PM
10/31/12 09:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
I can't say for sure who I think will win. I don't see Obama cruising to victory like most think he will. I also don't see Romney making a complete sweep of the midwest. We will have to see.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673305
10/31/12 10:05 PM
10/31/12 10:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: Camarel


RCP has it as a tie which seems to be the average based on all major polls ( correct me if i'm wrong americans ) i'm predicting an Obama win from what i've read though i don't think he deserves it.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html


We disagree alot (in fact most of the time) but me and Skinny agree on who will win. Difference only in EV score.

All this smoke in the air (mostly by the right) about how Pennsylvania and Minnesota and Michigan and whatever are really toss-up, well I consider them just that, smoke. I'm reminded of 4 years ago when Georgia and Dakota (North?) were talked up as potential Obama swing states...and while he had higher than usual non-redneck Democratic candidate voting % in those states (he lost Georgia by only 5), never once did I seriously consider him winning them from the polls I constantly read and compared at the time.

I do find it interesting the contrast between national and state polls, both which telling different stories. (On that note, National Journal's newest poll has Obama up by 5. Their last poll had a tie.)


I've not checked but guess the NJ poll is included in the RCP average. The one thing i'd like to say as a non American is that the majority of non Romney voters are basing it on GOP policies (abortion,gay marriage) while non Obama voters base it on his dismal record as President . As a meaningless Scot i endorse Gary Johnson smile

Re: Election 2012 [Re: Camarel] #673306
10/31/12 10:10 PM
10/31/12 10:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Camarel

I've not checked but guess the NJ poll is included in the RCP average. The one thing i'd like to say as a non American is that the majority of non Romney voters are basing it on GOP policies (abortion,gay marriage) while non Obama voters base it on his dismal record as President . As a meaningless Scot i endorse Gary Johnson smile


An improving economy is a dismal record?

But you are right about the GOP with that Christianite base, who have dragged that party down this side of Lindsey Lohan in your entourage.

EDIT - So the big Drudge scoop is about a "powerful Senator." I'm almost reminded of Trump in that the reveal won't match the hype. (Except Trump is a clown who trolled the media successfully.)

Last edited by ronnierocketAGO; 10/31/12 10:11 PM.
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673307
10/31/12 10:14 PM
10/31/12 10:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: Camarel

I've not checked but guess the NJ poll is included in the RCP average. The one thing i'd like to say as a non American is that the majority of non Romney voters are basing it on GOP policies (abortion,gay marriage) while non Obama voters base it on his dismal record as President . As a meaningless Scot i endorse Gary Johnson smile


An improving economy is a dismal record?


Ronnie that is certainly debatable. Also the Democratic party has just as many half wits in its base (*cough Biden). I hate tea partiers and those extreme christian nutjobs as much as you do, but let's be fair here. The Democrats are not without fault.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673308
10/31/12 10:28 PM
10/31/12 10:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: Camarel

I've not checked but guess the NJ poll is included in the RCP average. The one thing i'd like to say as a non American is that the majority of non Romney voters are basing it on GOP policies (abortion,gay marriage) while non Obama voters base it on his dismal record as President . As a meaningless Scot i endorse Gary Johnson smile


An improving economy is a dismal record?

But you are right about the GOP with that Christianite base, who have dragged that party down this side of Lindsey Lohan in your entourage.

EDIT - So the big Drudge scoop is about a "powerful Senator." I'm almost reminded of Trump in that the reveal won't match the hype. (Except Trump is a clown who trolled the media successfully.)


I may be wrong but since you've not produced any numbers indicating a recovering economy .

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obama-romney-surrogates-spin-jobs-data/

The job increase that Obama claims needs to factor in the amount that's dropped out the work force my link is from July because i couldn't find a non bias recent survey . I'm probably wrong but i'd like something showing me an improving economy .

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673309
10/31/12 10:36 PM
10/31/12 10:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Camarel politics are so biased in the USA it's unbelievable. I don't know how it is in the UK but here it's awful.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #673312
10/31/12 10:45 PM
10/31/12 10:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Camarel politics are so biased in the USA it's unbelievable. I don't know how it is in the UK but here it's awful.


It's not as bad here Imo in Scotland the Tories (Conservative) have no chance other than that though 3rd parties actually have a chance as shown by the last election . Especially in England though it's more or less full of independents which all parties need to throw themselves at to get the election . I respect you for being an independent don't let any party entice you bro wink

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673317
10/31/12 11:00 PM
10/31/12 11:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
I may be voting for Romney, but for my own reasons. Tbh, both sides annoy me in this country, especially tea partiers like Michelle Bachmann (vomit) or conservative idiots like Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh. However the left is just as frustrating (Joe Biden, Al Sharpton, Chris Matthews)and intolerant.

Frankly both sides are guilty of bias and igorance. They find little tidbits and information that support what they think is right, while totally ignoring what doesn't. Quite frankly I see that on this board.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #673318
10/31/12 11:13 PM
10/31/12 11:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
I may be voting for Romney, but for my own reasons.


Home state?

Re: Election 2012 [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #673319
10/31/12 11:14 PM
10/31/12 11:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
I may be voting for Romney, but for my own reasons. Tbh, both sides annoy me in this country, especially tea partiers like Michelle Bachmann (vomit) or conservative idiots like Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh. However the left is just as frustrating (Joe Biden, Al Sharpton, Chris Matthews)and intolerant.

Frankly both sides are guilty of bias and igorance. They find little tidbits and information that support what they think is right, while totally ignoring what doesn't. Quite frankly I see that on this board.


Well said Joe you can tell you're taking an informed decision by ignoring the right and lefft propaganda and looking at the results,plans,history etc of the 2 candidates

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673320
10/31/12 11:15 PM
10/31/12 11:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
I may be voting for Romney, but for my own reasons.


Home state?


Is his home state not liberal?

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673323
10/31/12 11:20 PM
10/31/12 11:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Joe is from Mass, and well the last Mass President was what, JFK?

Again I ask: If both sides are so rotten, why do you or anybody rule out voting 3rd party?

Your local shitty McDonalds doesn't improve service if you bitch but you keep going there.

Last edited by ronnierocketAGO; 10/31/12 11:20 PM.
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673324
10/31/12 11:20 PM
10/31/12 11:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
I may be voting for Romney, but for my own reasons.


Home state?


The state I was born and raised is Massachusetts. It's where I live now and where I will always live.

And thank you Camarel much obliged. I think more Americans should abide by that sort of political thinking rather than automatically assuming one way is the "right way". And as I said before, both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of it.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673325
10/31/12 11:21 PM
10/31/12 11:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
S
Skinny_Vinny Offline
Capo
Skinny_Vinny  Offline
S
Capo
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
The problem with the Left is they can take things too far.

Not voting for Obama? You're a racist!

College professor and you think marriage is between one man and one woman? You can be suspended. It has happened.

They overreact. They did it to Whole Foods. They did it to Chick-fil-A. You have to fear for your job or business if you are not in line with their view of the world.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #673326
10/31/12 11:24 PM
10/31/12 11:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo


And thank you Camarel much obliged. I think more Americans should abide by that sort of political thinking rather than automatically assuming one way is the "right way". And as I said before, both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of it.


Because people want simplicity in their lives. Look at religion: Follow the true God/gods and fight against the demons/evil or whatever.

Not to mention the system is rigged so ridiculously in favor of the 2 party system, and we're conditioned as such to follow this mindset.

Again why not vote say Libertarian? Camarel mentioned Johnson. He's a honest small government conservative, not the sort who preach against Big Government only to whore it out. (Notice how much politics and religion, literally or metaphorical, are intertwined.)

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673327
10/31/12 11:24 PM
10/31/12 11:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Joe is from Mass, and well the last Mass President was what, JFK?

Again I ask: If both sides are so rotten, why do you or anybody rule out voting 3rd party?

Your local shitty McDonalds doesn't improve service if you bitch but you keep going there.


Well I don't go to McDonalds first off lol

But to answer your questions I don't vote for someone that clearly won't win the election and has no hope of doing so. As much I would like the idea of a Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, it's not realistic. So what I do is take both candidates (Obama and Romney) and evaluate them on all sorts of different issues (economy, foreign policy, social issues, the deficit etc) . I weigh the circumstances of the times and what the US needs at this particular moment vs what the candidates would do.

In this case, for me, it was close. But I decided on Romney.


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673329
10/31/12 11:30 PM
10/31/12 11:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Joe is from Mass, and well the last Mass President was what, JFK?

Again I ask: If both sides are so rotten, why do you or anybody rule out voting 3rd party?

Your local shitty McDonalds doesn't improve service if you bitch but you keep going there.


Mass has among the most presidents if that means anything which i personally don't think it should.
If you're talking to Joe with your last sentence he's made 5 or 6 maybe more comments in this thread you probably made your first comment within the first 10 pages so it's a bit harsh saying that to someone just because he's going to vote Romney.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: Skinny_Vinny] #673331
10/31/12 11:37 PM
10/31/12 11:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Skinny_Vinny
The problem with the Left is they can take things too far.

Not voting for Obama? You're a racist!


Enough.

Besides the "racism=vote" crap you Skinny keep bringing up my friend is nonsense. Hey we elected a black President. He didn't win the primaries and general election because he was black. (And that talked up "Bradley Effect" libs feared didn't happen 4 years ago.) He might win re-election, but it won't be because he's black. (Notice Joe and Camarel are voting against him because of the economy.) There is white noise, and then there is reality.

Certainly (I don't think at least) Willard won't win or lose because of his Mormonism, an issue that surprisingly (and thankfully) didn't negatively come up this summer, fall as much as I cynically expected. Which is a good thing, right? It's been a non-issue from what I've seen mainstream wise. (Notice I said mainstream. Andrew Sullivan on his blog recently has been on a tear about the racist LDS back in the 60s/70s, which is true but...so what? How does that matter for next week?)

Skinny, let me ask you this. If Willard loses, will some people argue that he lost because of religious bias? Are people who don't vote for him prejudicial? Will you be pressing that point?

Last edited by ronnierocketAGO; 10/31/12 11:39 PM.
Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673334
10/31/12 11:45 PM
10/31/12 11:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
S
Skinny_Vinny Offline
Capo
Skinny_Vinny  Offline
S
Capo
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
Ronnie. All we're going to hear about is racism against Obama. AP. msnbc. NY Times.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Black bloggers are all over it. Accusations of racism are a constant tactic of the Left.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9KrAPgDT6n8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FIya48ogpsI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673335
10/31/12 11:51 PM
10/31/12 11:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Camarel Offline
Underboss
Camarel  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
Originally Posted By: Skinny_Vinny
The problem with the Left is they can take things too far.

Not voting for Obama? You're a racist!


Enough.

Besides the "racism=vote" crap you Skinny keep bringing up my friend is nonsense. Hey we elected a black President. He didn't win the primaries and general election because he was black. (And that talked up "Bradley Effect" libs feared didn't happen 4 years ago.) He might win re-election, but it won't be because he's black. (Notice Joe and Camarel are voting against him because of the economy.) There is white noise, and then there is reality.

Certainly (I don't think at least) Willard won't win or lose because of his Mormonism, an issue that surprisingly (and thankfully) didn't negatively come up this summer, fall as much as I cynically expected. Which is a good thing, right? It's been a non-issue from what I've seen mainstream wise. (Notice I said mainstream. Andrew Sullivan on his blog recently has been on a tear about the racist LDS back in the 60s/70s, which is true but...so what? How does that matter for next week?)

Skinny, let me ask you this. If Willard loses, will some people argue that he lost because of religious bias? Are people who don't vote for him prejudicial? Will you be pressing that point?


Camarel won't be voting against him because he's Scottish wink.

In all honesty though i don't see why anybody would unless it's social issues (abortion,gay marriage) imo it seems the US wants to reward Obamas failure with the economy because they believe Romneys going to make a difference on abortion issues which most experts agree it's not going to budge regardless of the presidents views.

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673336
10/31/12 11:52 PM
10/31/12 11:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens
S
Skinny_Vinny Offline
Capo
Skinny_Vinny  Offline
S
Capo
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 422
Tampa and Queens

Re: Election 2012 [Re: ronnierocketAGO] #673337
10/31/12 11:56 PM
10/31/12 11:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
That's exactly what I'm saying Camarel. Romney's views on abortion and gay marriage, whatever they are, aren't going to affect the law itself if he wins the Presidency. Abortion will continue to be legal, while gay marriage will be left to the individual states (as it should be)


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Page 109 of 141 1 2 107 108 109 110 111 140 141

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™