1 registered members (1 invisible),
387
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,354
Posts1,059,102
Members10,349
|
Most Online796 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50724
04/03/05 01:31 PM
04/03/05 01:31 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
JustMe
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
|
Originally posted by LOC: Not only Lucy's issues, but Puzo unecessarily concentrated way too much on Fontainne, his friend, Lucy's boyfriend and it seemed like at times he was writing a dictionary on sex. I don't know what this had to do with the Corleone family. It just totally ruinned the pace of the book and leaved me incredibly bored.
The movies is easily MUCH superior to the novel. Of course I cannot agree with your last assertion, I consider the book, meaning its main storyline, endlessly superior to the movies. As to annoying additions, they were written for a certain purpose. Puzo decided to make his book a bestseller, and at that time (according to Turnbull's information ) what sold books was sex and Hollywood stars. So he included those parts, unnecessary and not connected to the rest of the novel. They are even written in a language obviously worse IMO, as if he didn't work on them at all. But they are so inconsiderable that it doesn't make problem to skip them without losing anything. They cannot cloud this book, otherwise absolutely brilliant, subtle and insightful masterpiece, full of stunning knowledge of human nature.
keep your mouth shut, and your eyes open.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50727
04/06/05 08:03 PM
04/06/05 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319 Providence, RI
Moscarelli
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319
Providence, RI
|
I am with you all on how Puzo had to stoop down and get so much in detail with Lucy and Johnny. But, I mean, to us, this stuff is all just...well crap, and I am sure that Puzo felt just the same. However, Puzo said he put that stuff in just to sell more copies, and the book was on the bestsellers list for quite a while. So, who knows, maybe if it wasn't for all of this, the book would have been a flop and the movies might not have ever been made.
Nonetheless, the book is much better then the movies. It goes much more in detail with the Corleones, sadly along with the extras.
"The toe you stepped on yesterday may be attached to the ass you have to kiss today." -Former Mayor of Providence, RI, Vincent "Buddy" Cianci
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50728
04/07/05 10:49 AM
04/07/05 10:49 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,513 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,513
AZ
|
I've posted this before (so please bear with me): Puzo was one of those authors who can't resist passing on any bit of erudition they've picked up, whether or not it's relevant to the plot of the novel they're writing. I'm guessing that a female close to Puzo had had the condition and operation he ascribed to Lucy. He interested himself in the case. And (this is what pisses me off), he created that l-o-o-o-ng, boring Vegas sequence with Lucy and Jules just so he could describe the operation he learned about. I could have done without any and all of the Lucy/Jules stuff, all of the Nino crap, and all of the Johnny Fontaine nonsense after Connie's wedding. Objectionable as it is, this stuff is nowhere near as bad as that Hollywood-insider strunz that nearly wrecked "The Last Don."
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50729
04/07/05 12:12 PM
04/07/05 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058 The Slippery Slope
plawrence
RIP StatMan
|
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
|
While I didn't need a blow-by-blow description of Lucy's "problem" and her operation, we should bear in mind that Lucy and Jules were peripheral characters in the Johnny Fontaine storyline, and from the amount of space devoted to Johnny, we can infer that it was clearly Puzo's intention to have him as the second or third (after Vito and Mike) main character in the book.
I think Puzo intended to draw a parallel between the "illegitimate" business world of the Mafia, and the supposed legitimate business world of Hollywood, and the rise to power in each of their worlds by Michael and Johnny.
I always viewed Lucy and Jules and Nino and Ginny as simply added characters to help flesh out Johnny's story.
Actually, if you cut out the Johnny Fontaine story, it would be a pretty short book, wouldn't it?
"Difficult....not impossible"
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50731
04/07/05 03:47 PM
04/07/05 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 118 Palermo, Sicily
Sonny DiCosca
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 118
Palermo, Sicily
|
Sush... the femanists are coming.
I may have a bad reputation but I don't have a bad gun.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50732
04/08/05 03:46 AM
04/08/05 03:46 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058 The Slippery Slope
plawrence
RIP StatMan
|
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
|
Originally posted by JustMe: This is one of the cases where size means so little... Don't let Sonny or Lucy hear that. It's because of, um, "size" that we got started with this topic in the first place.
"Difficult....not impossible"
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50734
04/08/05 03:08 PM
04/08/05 03:08 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
JustMe
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
|
Originally posted by plawrence: Originally posted by JustMe: [b] This is one of the cases where size means so little... It's because of, um, "size" that we got started with this topic in the first place. [/b]I knew you were the one to appreciate this joke in all its complexity!
keep your mouth shut, and your eyes open.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50737
04/09/05 11:49 PM
04/09/05 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319 Providence, RI
Moscarelli
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 319
Providence, RI
|
Well I think that would kind of mock the fact that they were having sex if they did that. I didn't find it at all gratuitous but if they only showed Tom talking to Sonny through the door, it would seem as though they were censoring it. It would be as though they were making the movie only for those who giggle when ever you say the word penis.
I don't know, just my opinion.
"The toe you stepped on yesterday may be attached to the ass you have to kiss today." -Former Mayor of Providence, RI, Vincent "Buddy" Cianci
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50739
04/10/05 05:00 AM
04/10/05 05:00 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
JustMe
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
|
Originally posted by svsg: So was apollonia's nudity, though this was (I speculate) FFC's own idea. Wait, svsg, you have so much to read about Apolla yet! Where are you BTW? When you finish, we shall be waiting for you in the quotation game. Don't forget!
keep your mouth shut, and your eyes open.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50742
05/12/05 05:45 PM
05/12/05 05:45 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156 Canada
SlimTrashman
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
Canada
|
Originally posted by Tony Love: I actually didn't mind the extended part about Johnny Fontane. It (of course) wasn't my favorite part, but it made a side story I found somewhat interesting. However, not in a perverted sense. Agreed. I didnt mind the Lucy/doctor sequence at all and found it rather interesting. Though now that I think about it, doesnt it seem like Mark Winegardner might have written that part of the book I have read on several diffrent message boards that Puzo had wanted to write a book about Fontane detailing the hollywood underworld. Perhaps this was supposed to lead up to it
You go in alive and you come out dead
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50743
05/15/05 02:30 PM
05/15/05 02:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,854 Milky Way
Enzo Scifo
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,854
Milky Way
|
I must say that when I first saw the GF, the character of Johnny F didn't really, ... how to say this in English, ... wasn't interesting at all. But when I read the book, and then watched the movie again, all became a bit more clear. Everything in the movie that had to do with Johnny made more sense. So the Johnny Fontane part WASN'T useless. It was not well-written, it was boring, and it was too long, it was nothing compared to the rest of the book, but it wasn't useless. The L. Mancini part was useless, in my opinion. Does anyone agree?
See, we can act as smart as we want, but at the end of the day, we still follow a guy who fucks himself with kebab skewers.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50748
05/09/06 08:18 AM
05/09/06 08:18 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12 Louisiana
Baxter
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12
Louisiana
|
My personal story... I was in history class, reading the Godfather. I just happened to get to the vivid sex description page whem my teacher walked by. She has a large mole and a panty line, but that isn't relavant. Anyway, she turns the book to see the cover and says..."Oh, that's a good book. It's better than the movie." Now later on that day, I explained the above sequence of events to my friend. I had her read the Sonny/Lucy sex page and then told her that the mole-faced teacher had read it as well AND said it was better than the movie. She LITERALLY cried and nearly up-chucked right there. So...in my teacher's subconscious, WHY did she like the book more than the movie? And the kicker...I'm in 8th grade and have seen some pretty disgusting and perverted things in my day, being a teenager...at a school. But the Godfather sex page takes the cake.
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
#50750
06/29/06 02:42 PM
06/29/06 02:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2 NJ
Kastrioti
Associate
|
Associate
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
NJ
|
Originally posted by Enzo Scifo: So the Johnny Fontane part WASN'T useless. It was not well-written, it was boring, and it was too long, it was nothing compared to the rest of the book, but it wasn't useless. The L. Mancini part was useless, in my opinion. Does anyone agree? I agree, Enzo. The Johnny Fontane Fontane/Nino Valenti parts didn't bother me too much. In a way, they were sort of relevant (although definitely peripheral) to the main story, being as how Johnny was the Don's Godson. And the whole thing about him repaying his Godfather by taking care of Nino said a lot about the Don's character and motivations. However, the Lucy Mancini stuff was completely superfluous. I mean, who was she? Some broad Sonny was "doing the job" on who happened to have a "huge box". Her part should have been minimal. And Jules Segal should not have come into the story at all. He was the only character in the entire book who seemed really out of place to me. He felt like he didn't belong, and every time I read a part with him in it, I couldn't wait for it to be over. He took me out of the world of the Corleones. Unlike the Don and other men of real power, he was not humble but haughty, reveling in his "the doctor is God" complex, talking any way he chose not only to Lucy, but also to Johnny and Nino. He wasn't even Sicilian or connected in any way. Who did he think he was? And then he had the nerve to show ingratitude to Michael and qualify his acceptance of a much-needed position at the new hospital with the proviso that it had "no strings". I love Puzo's work, but I hated that character, and he wasn't a character the reader was supposed to hate. I'd much rather have had the expository information about the Vegas operation through a story based around Fredo.
Al Pacino (Michael): My father is no different than any powerful man, any man with power, like a president or senator. Diane Keaton (Kay): Do you know how naive you sound, Michael? Presidents and senators don't have men killed! Al Pacino (Michael): Oh. Who's being naive, Kay?
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
[Re: Kastrioti]
#355719
01/09/07 04:31 PM
01/09/07 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
Consigliere to the Stars
|
Consigliere to the Stars
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
[quote=Kastrioti.
However, the Lucy Mancini stuff was completely superfluous. I mean, who was she? Some broad Sonny was "doing the job" on who happened to have a "huge box". Her part should have been minimal. And Jules Segal should not have come into the story at all. He was the only character in the entire book who seemed really out of place to me. He felt like he didn't belong, and every time I read a part with him in it, I couldn't wait for it to be over. He took me out of the world of the Corleones.
[/quote]
That was the weakest part of the book... but dont forget it was written not as great literature but as something on which Puzo wanted to make money. Sex sells, and he put gratuituous sex into the book for that reason.
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
Re: The Vaginafather
[Re: olivant]
#453211
11/25/07 08:21 PM
11/25/07 08:21 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 13 Skid Row
Eddie_The_Cag
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 13
Skid Row
|
I agree that the entire subplot involving poor Loosey and her unfortunate anatomical configuration made for fairly horrible reading. And as if all this wasn't dismaying enough, we also had to hear all about Sonny's great throbbing mule...
I also agree with those above who emphasized the idea that Mario Puzo was primarily concerned with the commercial sales potential of the final product while creating it. So it stands to reason that Puzo-- and his publishers-- felt that this sordid little section of the novel would boost its sales appeal. As it turned out, they were absolutely correct about this.
But the question remains as to why Puzo and Company thought that it would be a good idea to develop the whole Lucy-and-Sonny thing to the level of a subplot.
The most brief answer possible is that at the time of publication (1969) the initial target audience of the marketing program (i.e., mainstream citizens of the United States) were involved in a sort of sexual revolution that was just beginning to really gain speed and altitude. Even so, most of those who were not at all urbane or extremely sophisticated in sexual matters more complicated than the basic birds-and-bees approach were, at that time, thoroughly titillated and deliciously scandalized by such open talk about matters that were only whispered about-- if that, even.
Mario also managed to throw a twist in there by writing about a sexual matter that was also medical in nature. As it was during those times, many people had a morbid fascination with the gory details of grotesque medical matters-- and especially when such matters pertained somehow to sex and sexual psychology.
And people still get off to stuff like this. Witness the success of the television show Nip/Tuck. Once again we have squirmy medical procedures co-mingled with an aspect of sex, and it's a hot item.
The author of The Godfather didn't just stop with Lucy and her scooter repairs when it came to medical meanderings. We also heard about mastectomies, doctors busted as abortionists, and little black moles that turned into killer carcinomas. And Johnny Fontaine had tumors on his vocal chords (a little bit more malignant imagery there for us to brood upon), Nino was a suicidally depressed alcoholic, and Michael had a busted face and a bad attitude.
The public was shocked, horrified, and absolutely delighted by all this talk. It made common folks feel like real sophisticates-- and even intellectual nihilists-- to merely know of such things. And the book sold like hotcakes!
But it wasn't just sex that was being sold, or even medical sex. Instead, old Mario was peddling sex and death, and it was an irresistible combination.
He wasn't the only person to profit from doing so. There were other works that became major best sellers because of their sexual and/or pathological contents in the same year The Godfather was published.
Which leaves us with a final question: why is this section of the book no longer appealing-- not even to those of us who read it when it first came out?
Cutting it to the bone, I would say that it is because the subject matter involved in the Lucy-and-Sonny genitalia issue is no longer of such a shocking nature as it originally was.
For the last quarter of a century, we have been inundated information and imagery concerning matters of a sexual nature than have grown increasingly more bizarre and psychologically evocative as the years went by. To put it simply, a mere loose goose and a sew-up job to tighten it is no longer a thing for us to gawk, fret, salivate, or marvel at. Insofar as shocking sexual imagery goes, Lucy and her little problem are no longer culturally relevant. They've been blown out of the water by things of a far more complex and (to some) interesting nature.
In my original post, I tackled the question of what the appeal of the Johnny/Nino might have been, but this rendered an already-overweight and highly mouthy message into an embarrassingly long absurdity. So again, attempting to cut this matter to the bone, I will say only that Johnny and Nino were interesting to the audience of the later Sixties and early Seventies because they provided the readers with a way to become more familiar with the dissolute ways of media stars from glitzy Hollywood than was available through the usual medium of the tabloid press of that era. Also, the relationship between Johnny and Nino, and their personal relationships with various types of interesting, disgusting, sexy and wayward women provided more of the same type of titillation that the Lucy Affair gave to the reader. But in the same way that the Lucy material came to be passe, so did the Johnny Fontaine story.
Last edited by Eddie_The_Cag; 11/26/07 04:10 AM. Reason: Original Draft Shortened
|
|
|
|