GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (ChiTown), 403 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,782
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,286
Hollander 24,343
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,528
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,415
Posts1,060,537
Members10,349
Most Online911
May 23rd, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: Turnbull] #342377
11/13/06 09:23 AM
11/13/06 09:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
I
Ice Offline OP
Underboss
Ice  Offline OP
I
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
Since Rocco was linked to Michael, shouldn't Michael have been concerned that if Rocco were killed or captured at the airport, the trail would lead right back to Michael? Michael was a careful man, and I doubt he would have left a loose end like that. I'm guessing that, even though Rocco had been a visible member of his entourage for years (including very visible service as Michael's security guy during Anthony's party), Michael probably had made provisions to portray Rocco for the record as some kind of independent security contractor so that he could have plausible deniability.


I have thought about that TB. For that matter what precautions would have been taken for ANY assassins that Mike figured would have been captured in the Roth hit? As I stated in my earlier post, given the 'physics' of the hit if you will(inside an airport w/ Roth surrounded) the possibility of the assassins NOT escaping has to be on the forefront of Mike's mind. Which is why I speculated he sent one gun instead of say four, one dead gunman instead of 3 dead gunman and 1 FBI hostage.



Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: olivant] #342398
11/13/06 11:39 AM
11/13/06 11:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso Offline
Consigliere to the Stars
dontomasso  Offline
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
Originally Posted By: olivant
Well,I still say it was an FFC theatrical device.



It had to be. TB's point is well taken, however the fact of the matter is that Rocco was shot dead, and thus was identified by the FBI as one of Michael's hitters. I would suppose that Michael had some kind of means by which he could deny involvement but you would think that someone at the FBI might start sniffing a little pattern here....first all the enemies of the Corleones die on the same afternoon in New York, then a few years later Freank Pentangeli and Hyman Roth die at more or less the same time.


"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"

"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."

"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."

Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: dontomasso] #342408
11/13/06 01:07 PM
11/13/06 01:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
I
Ice Offline OP
Underboss
Ice  Offline OP
I
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
I would suppose that Michael had some kind of means by which he could deny involvement


Perhaps this is why he asks Tom 'are you gonna come along with me in these things I have to do or what.' He knew he was going to have to explain his ties to the dead assassins. Which again begs the question why not hire an untraceable assassin? But then again where the heck do you find one is willing to go on a hit like this one?(ROCCOROCCOROCCO)



Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: Ice] #342422
11/13/06 02:09 PM
11/13/06 02:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,528
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,528
AZ
Originally Posted By: Ice
Originally Posted By: dontomasso
I would suppose that Michael had some kind of means by which he could deny involvement


Perhaps this is why he asks Tom 'are you gonna come along with me in these things I have to do or what.' He knew he was going to have to explain his ties to the dead assassins.

That point is very well taken, Ice! I'd always thought that when Michael said, "Are you gonna come along with me in these things I have to do," he meant convincing Frankie to kill himself. But clearly, he'd need Tom's "respectability" and his front as the family lawyer (same front used at the Senate hearings) to explain away Michael's ties to Rocco if Rocco were killed or captured in the Roth hit.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: Turnbull] #342505
11/13/06 05:52 PM
11/13/06 05:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,022
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,022
Texas
I think that with those words, Michael was continuing his long-lasting insult of Tom. Michael said it in the same way as your boss might tell you if you raise an objection or ask a question "if you don't like working here you can go somewhere else." he would have said that to Tom no matter what action Mike proposed on any subject. They just happened to be discussing murder at the time. That's one reason and a major one that prompted Tom to tell Frankie who compared the Corleones to the Roman Empire "it once was."


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: Ice] #344550
11/21/06 01:25 AM
11/21/06 01:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 102
9
90caliber Offline
Made Member
90caliber  Offline
9
Made Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 102
Ice -

I think you're dead on the money in suspecting Rocco. Note in addition that Rocco is wearing an orange jacket at the beginning of Pt. II, and that it is Rocco, not Ola, who hands Michael the "orange from Miami."

A traitor on the inside must have killed the two men sent to kill Michael, and once it is granted that it could not have been Fredo, all arrows point to Rocco.

~90caliber

Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: 90caliber] #344552
11/21/06 01:53 AM
11/21/06 01:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
slappy Offline
Button
slappy  Offline
Button
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
fredo never killed anyone... this is a fact


Hi guys! I'm new around here!!!
Re: Rocco's treachery? [Re: Ice] #344650
11/21/06 12:41 PM
11/21/06 12:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
I
Ice Offline OP
Underboss
Ice  Offline OP
I
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Its also possible that Fredo allowed the assassins on the grounds. If they arrived w/ Johnny they would have been recognized after they were dead. Fredo did not slice the assassins throats, a cpl of Ola's men did that, and these men were shielded by Fredo and later allowed to escape.

Perhaps Freddie was told by Roth 'Open the drapes so we can get a good look at what we are shooting, they are just gonna scare your brother a bit, fire a few shots into his room, get him to thinking.' Of course I think too its also possible that they were indeed just trying to scare Mike, and thats the only reason he lived.

Last edited by Ice; 11/22/06 03:30 PM.


Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™