|
Forums21
Topics42,337
Posts1,058,861
Members10,349
| |
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Re: Why not show FF war of 1933?
#207803
06/10/03 12:47 PM
06/10/03 12:47 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 47
New Olreans
Irish_Consigliere
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 47
New Olreans
|
I think that was probably the idea. Any storyline which included never before told stories about Sonny would almost certainly have to include the FF war.
"Come on, Mike, you won. Do you have to wipe out everybody?"
|
|
|
Re: Why not show FF war of 1933?
#207805
11/02/03 03:19 PM
11/02/03 03:19 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273
Hell
Mike Sullivan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273
Hell
|
Originally posted by Don Pope:
they should just make it like the godfather part II, except instead of micheal and vito, its vincent and santino. One Problem. Vincvent and Santino would be imposible. SOme one would need to play Sonny and Sonny had no role in the family as far as being a don.
Madness! Madness!
- Major Clipton
The Bridge On The River Kwai
GOLD - GOLD - GOLD - GOLD. Bright and Yellow, Hard and Cold, Molten, Graven, Hammered, Rolled, Hard to Get and Light to Hold; Stolen, Borrowed, Squandered - Doled.
- Greed
Nothing Is Written
Lawrence Of Arabia
|
|
|
Re: Why not show FF war of 1933?
#207808
11/02/03 10:54 PM
11/02/03 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273
Hell
Mike Sullivan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273
Hell
|
Hw wouldnt be able to tell about all the wars and such...
Madness! Madness!
- Major Clipton
The Bridge On The River Kwai
GOLD - GOLD - GOLD - GOLD. Bright and Yellow, Hard and Cold, Molten, Graven, Hammered, Rolled, Hard to Get and Light to Hold; Stolen, Borrowed, Squandered - Doled.
- Greed
Nothing Is Written
Lawrence Of Arabia
|
|
|
Re: Why not show FF war of 1933?
#207809
11/03/03 04:40 PM
11/03/03 04:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Originally posted by Mike Sulivan:
[quote]Originally posted by Don Pope:
[b] they should just make it like the godfather part II, except instead of micheal and vito, its vincent and santino. One Problem. Vincvent and Santino would be imposible. SOme one would need to play Sonny and Sonny had no role in the family as far as being a don. [/b][/quote]Exactly. Everyone always says the point of the two story lines in II was to show a father and his son, which is only half correct. What they we're trying to do was show two generations of the Corleone empire, in it's growing stages and it's point of decompostiton and it's fall, and the contrasts between Don's. So if IV does take place in two places at two times, it should be Michael in the 70s, recovering from his daughters death and eventually getting wound back up in crime, and then have 1997 (after michaels death)showing Vinchenzo getting the family back up top, in america. Maybe he could even try to make michael's dreams of the family buisness becoming legit. a reality.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
|
