GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (JGil916), 402 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,603
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,285
Hollander 24,080
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,517
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,372
Posts1,059,533
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
The Future of Movies by 2015? #120792
08/01/05 10:54 PM
08/01/05 10:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee

Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120793
08/02/05 06:04 PM
08/02/05 06:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone Offline
Underboss
long_lost_corleone  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
"ticket sales this summer have dropped about 10 percent."

With cinematic gold such as Fantastic Four, Hitch, and a Big Mommas House sequel on the way, how could this be? :rolleyes:


"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120794
08/02/05 06:35 PM
08/02/05 06:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
The Dr. who fixed Lucy Offline
Underboss
The Dr. who fixed Lucy  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
Don't forget the pointless remakes of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Dukes of Hazzard, as well as Dark Water (a slight variation on the Ring, without the creepy girl). Oh, and War of the Worlds. This is indeed a dark year for cinema.


Joey ...

BANG BANG

... Saza!
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120795
08/02/05 06:38 PM
08/02/05 06:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone Offline
Underboss
long_lost_corleone  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
Charlie was decent, and better than the original, as Burton is a cinematic genius.


"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120796
08/02/05 06:40 PM
08/02/05 06:40 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
Canada
SlimTrashman Offline
Made Member
SlimTrashman  Offline
Made Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
Canada
Quote:
Originally posted by long_lost_corleone:
"ticket sales this summer have dropped about 10 percent."
this figure isnt accurate, remember a little movie called 'the passion of the christ?'


You go in alive and you come out dead
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120797
08/02/05 06:42 PM
08/02/05 06:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
The Dr. who fixed Lucy Offline
Underboss
The Dr. who fixed Lucy  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
Quote:
Charlie was decent, and better than the original, as Burton is a cinematic genius.
Yeah, but: Johnny Depp.

Johnny Depp


Joey ...

BANG BANG

... Saza!
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120798
08/02/05 06:42 PM
08/02/05 06:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,453
California
X
XDCX Offline
XDCX  Offline
X

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,453
California
Quote:
Originally posted by SlimTrashman:
[quote]Originally posted by long_lost_corleone:
[b] "ticket sales this summer have dropped about 10 percent."
this figure isnt accurate, remember a little movie called 'the passion of the christ?' [/b][/quote]Passion came out last year.


"Growing up my dad was like 'You have a great last name, Galifianakis. Galifianakis...begins with a gal...and ends with a kiss...' I'm like that's great dad, can we get it changed to 'Galifianafuck' please?" -- Zach Galifianakis



Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120799
08/02/05 06:43 PM
08/02/05 06:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Ouch.

I also blame how that people are probably tired of brainless summer blockbuster movies. Just look at the massive bombings of THE ISLAND and STEALTH, each cost around $125 million or so.

Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120800
08/02/05 06:47 PM
08/02/05 06:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,046
Miami, FL
Don Andrew Offline
Underboss
Don Andrew  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,046
Miami, FL
Quote:
Originally posted by The Dr. who fixed Lucy:
[quote]Charlie was decent, and better than the original, as Burton is a cinematic genius.
Yeah, but: Johnny Depp.

Johnny Depp
[/quote]What's wrong with Johnny Depp?


Hey, how's it going?
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120801
08/02/05 06:49 PM
08/02/05 06:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone Offline
Underboss
long_lost_corleone  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
Quote:
Originally posted by The Dr. who fixed Lucy:
[quote]Charlie was decent, and better than the original, as Burton is a cinematic genius.
Yeah, but: Johnny Depp.

Johnny Depp
[/quote]You mean Johnny Depp, one of the top two actors of his generation, along with Edward Norton? Oh, right, I despise his talent and craft. Ramble, ramble, ramble! Roar!


"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120802
08/02/05 06:52 PM
08/02/05 06:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
R
ronnierocketAGO Offline OP
ronnierocketAGO  Offline OP
R

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
Acutally, I thought Depp was despised for being filthy rich as well, but hey what do I know?

Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120803
08/02/05 06:57 PM
08/02/05 06:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,155
Some anonymous motel room.
Don Vercetti Offline
Don Vercetti  Offline

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,155
Some anonymous motel room.
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was a great film, and better then the original in making the characters more interesting.

You guys have to remember of course, that there are people who rely on downloading to see movies, or just DVDs nowadays. I'm not surprised it has dropped.

As for Depp, he is the best of the younger actors in America, IMO just ahead of Edward Norton.


Proud Member of the Gangster BB Bratpack - Fighting Elitism and Ignorance Since 2006
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120804
08/02/05 10:29 PM
08/02/05 10:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone Offline
Underboss
long_lost_corleone  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
Quote:
Originally posted by Don Vercetti:
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was a great film, and better then the original in making the characters more interesting.

You guys have to remember of course, that there are people who rely on downloading to see movies, or just DVDs nowadays. I'm not surprised it has dropped.

As for Depp, he is the best of the younger actors in America, IMO just ahead of Edward Norton.
At least somebody agrees with me...


"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120805
08/03/05 01:53 AM
08/03/05 01:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
The Dr. who fixed Lucy Offline
Underboss
The Dr. who fixed Lucy  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 770
UK
Quote:
Don_Andrew
What's wrong with Johnny Depp?
Oops, didn't really make myself clear. Nothing aganist Depp per se, just not happy that he was cast as Wonka (or that the movie was remade at all).

Depp is too young and engaging to play the mysterious and standoffish Wonka. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was one of my favorite childhood books, and I loved Wonka as an awkward miserable old bloke, a proper old-fashioned nutcase. Gene Wilder's portrayal of him was pretty much spot on, he had that edgy quality which Depp always aspires to.

Depp's cause is not helped by having appeared in the schmaltzy vomit-inducing Finding Neverland and his pantomime efforts in Pirates of the Carribean. Castnig him as Wonka is an insult to the orignal book and film; it is a typical Hollywood schmaltzification transforming a disturbing and profound work of fiction into sugar candy cinema. Hence:


Joey ...

BANG BANG

... Saza!
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120806
08/03/05 02:24 AM
08/03/05 02:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone Offline
Underboss
long_lost_corleone  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
Well, the original film wasn't really much like the book, and Raold Dhaul wasn't happy with it himself...

I find Depp to be a spectacular actor, and the remaking to be much more suiting for the dark-feeling of the book. Or, so that's my opinion.


"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120807
08/03/05 02:33 AM
08/03/05 02:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,309
Austin, TX
suspect_5 Offline
Underboss
suspect_5  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,309
Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO:
Ouch.

I also blame how that people are probably tired of brainless summer blockbuster movies. Just look at the massive bombings of THE ISLAND and STEALTH, each cost around $125 million or so.
I saw both of those, becaue I like brainless summer blockbuster movies. True they weren't even the greatest of that group of movies but some people like to go to movies for two hours of empty fun.

As for the article, god I hope theaters don't go away, I'll never be able to afford a screen that big, and I love the experiance of going to the movies with large crowds. I love going early to get a seat like a geek, I like the roaring laughter - like when I saw Undercover Brother and I missed at least three jokes because the laughter was so loud, I like the oos and ahs and screams not to mention the little moments that only happen at the theater. Like the thirty year old man wimpering like a school girl during The Ring 2- hell actually that was the best part of the movie, or when (granted this was a long time ago) when there was a preview for Strange Days and Ralph Fiennes is going through the "I'm your priest" speil and he says "have you ever jacked in?" someone down in front yells "Have you ever jacked off?". That happened years ago and I still remember it, I'll never tire of the theater and in fact they can pretty much count on me to be there every weekend.


--------------------------------------
This signature has been sanatized for your protection - The Staff
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120808
08/03/05 02:39 AM
08/03/05 02:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,155
Some anonymous motel room.
Don Vercetti Offline
Don Vercetti  Offline

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,155
Some anonymous motel room.
Quote:
Originally posted by long_lost_corleone:
Well, the original film wasn't really much like the book, and Raold Dhaul wasn't happy with it himself...
Yeah, Dahl hated it so much he refused to let them make a film out of the book's sequel. He was angry at the changes, like the new songs written for the film and the fact that the Oompa Loompas were changed from a fictional African tribe to the orange men, supposedly for obvious reasons. I think the film, however is a very good one, and a childhood favorite of mine, although it's not the masterpiece it's often made out to be. Neither is Burton's film, however his visuals and additions bring new life to the story, and deepen the interest. My only problem was that it got a little over the top at times. Depp's performance is good, although he has done better. I do believe Depp however when he said he did not base his performance on Michael Jackson, nor do I agree with Ebert's comment that "Depp wasn't bad, but it was a wrong performance" or something to that effect.


Proud Member of the Gangster BB Bratpack - Fighting Elitism and Ignorance Since 2006
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120809
08/03/05 08:41 AM
08/03/05 08:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 67,603
The Villa Quatro
Irishman12 Offline
UNDERBOSS
Irishman12  Offline
UNDERBOSS

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 67,603
The Villa Quatro
Quote:
Originally posted by suspect_5:
Like the thirty year old man wimpering like a school girl during The Ring 2- hell actually that was the best part of the movie
"Whoaaaaaaaaaaaaa!"

Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120810
08/03/05 08:44 AM
08/03/05 08:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 67,603
The Villa Quatro
Irishman12 Offline
UNDERBOSS
Irishman12  Offline
UNDERBOSS

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 67,603
The Villa Quatro
Quote:
Originally posted by The Dr. who fixed Lucy:
Depp's cause is not helped by having appeared in the schmaltzy vomit-inducing Finding Neverland and his pantomime efforts in Pirates of the Carribean
What was wrong with Captain Jack Sparrow or Sir James Matthew Barrie!? I loved Pirates of the Carribean and surprisingly liked Finding Neverland too

Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120811
08/03/05 10:37 AM
08/03/05 10:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence Offline
RIP StatMan
plawrence  Offline
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
Fifty-five years ago, everyone predicted that television would kill the movies, and it didn't.

What will happen in the future, I think, is that

-- Production costs will rise.
-- Admission prices will increase.
-- Attendance will decrease.
-- Fewer films will be produced.
-- With fewer films out there, we will witness a gradual disappearance of the huge expensive-to-operate multiplexes.
-- Seeing a movie in a theatre when it is first released will become more of an "exclusive" activity, like seeing a live show or sporting event.

But even if a film is available on DVD at the same time it is being shown in theatres, as long as people need somewhere to go on a Saturday night there will always be "the movies".

suspect_5 put it rather well.


"Difficult....not impossible"
Re: The Future of Movies by 2015? #120812
08/03/05 11:31 AM
08/03/05 11:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 709
Northern NJ
Daigo Mick Friend Offline
Underboss
Daigo Mick Friend  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 709
Northern NJ
Quote:
Originally posted by plawrence:
Fifty-five years ago, everyone predicted that television would kill the movies, and it didn't.

What will happen in the future, I think, is that

-- Production costs will rise.
-- Admission prices will increase.
-- Attendance will decrease.
-- Fewer films will be produced.
-- With fewer films out there, we will witness a gradual disappearance of the huge expensive-to-operate multiplexes.
-- Seeing a movie in a theatre when it is first released will become more of an "exclusive" activity, like seeing a live show or sporting event.

But even if a film is available on DVD at the same time it is being shown in theatres, as long as people need somewhere to go on a Saturday night there will always be "the movies".

suspect_5 put it rather well.
I agree, I think that have to get back to the Grand experience of Cinema. I read a little of the article and I think they are missing the point ( downloading a premiere feature and wathing it on TV which will only promote more crap).

Maybe they can revive the Grand theaters and only show the cream of the crop and keep the multi plexes for the rest of the crap.

Today a new release is only a 3 week advertising blitz for the DVD release.


"Francis can I have a momment"

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™