|
1 registered members (1 invisible),
255
guests, and 6
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,327
Posts1,058,683
Members10,349
| |
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Godfather too Detailed?
#50125
11/22/04 05:11 PM
11/22/04 05:11 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 134
AZ
Rudik
OP
Made Member
|
OP
Made Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 134
AZ
|
I have read The Godfather 3 times now. And what I notice about Puzo that he is too detailed. Not enough dialogue. Tell me if I am wrong.
Leave the gun and take the canoli.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50127
11/23/04 05:38 PM
11/23/04 05:38 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence
RIP StatMan
|
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
|
It's a novel. The author describes what's happening, he describes the physical surroundings, he describes what the characters are thinking.
You want dialogue, read the screenplay.
"Difficult....not impossible"
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50129
11/24/04 11:06 AM
11/24/04 11:06 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 376
Melbourne
Liz_85
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 376
Melbourne
|
I love Puzo so much because he's so descriptive. Mark Winegardner is much the same, so I'm glad he's the one who's written the prequel, we're keeping with the theme.
Personally, I prefer the detail to lots of dialogue. Like Plawrence said, I watch the movie if I feel like listening to people speak. The book creates great visuals, which is why I love it so much.
Diamonds Are A Girl's Best Friend
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50130
11/24/04 11:18 PM
11/24/04 11:18 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 924
toronto
mr. soprano
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 924
toronto
|
i personally think that the only place that puzo went into much detail on, and devoted to much time to, is the johnny fontane and lucy mancini parts. i find them boring, and i usually just skip those parts.
"strange things happen all the time, and so it goes and so it goes. and the book says, 'we may be through with the past, but the past is not through with us'" - MAGNOLIA
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50133
12/09/04 02:20 PM
12/09/04 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
JustMe
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
|
Yes, I skip those parts too. And it is really a good literature, written in a very decent language. As to its being too detailed... Details are what you read books for! Nothing else, even movie, can give you as much details of character, way of thinking, inner processes, as book can. That's why nothing can equal literature for the fullness of emotional experience. Only dreams and music, perhaps... 
keep your mouth shut, and your eyes open.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50138
01/20/05 02:57 PM
01/20/05 02:57 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762
Anytown, USA
goombah
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,762
Anytown, USA
|
Originally posted by Cancerkitty:
I gotta say, this Godfather is the only film I've ever seen that I prefered over the book. FFC cut out all the boring stuff, and all the weird sex-organ-deformation stuff, and that made all the difference for me. It seemed like Puzo couldn't decide between writing a mafia book or a porno sometimes. I would agree that FFC left out the less interesting stuff from the novel. However, I would have liked to see the following from the book: 1) inserted into the beginning of the GFII film: the scene between Kay & Hagen, where Hagen is sent to bring Kay home 2) a flashback scene showing Luca Brasi killing the 6 Capone men 3) a flashback to a young Santino telling Vito that Santino witnessed his father murdering Fannucci.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50139
01/22/05 11:16 AM
01/22/05 11:16 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 59
Holland
DutchGodfather
Button
|
Button
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 59
Holland
|
Originally posted by goombah: Originally posted by Cancerkitty:
[b] I gotta say, this Godfather is the only film I've ever seen that I prefered over the book. FFC cut out all the boring stuff, and all the weird sex-organ-deformation stuff, and that made all the difference for me. It seemed like Puzo couldn't decide between writing a mafia book or a porno sometimes.
1) inserted into the beginning of the GFII film: the scene between Kay & Hagen, where Hagen is sent to bring Kay home
2) a flashback scene showing Luca Brasi killing the 6 Capone men
3) a flashback to a young Santino telling Vito that Santino witnessed his father murdering Fannucci. [/b]4)The old lady in Sicily who asks Michael what happened to Luca Brasi. And that she tells the story of the Irish girl and the baby. It would have made Luca a lot more scarier if FFC putted that in the movie.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50140
01/22/05 05:11 PM
01/22/05 05:11 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
JustMe
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,733
|
Originally posted by DutchGodfather: Originally posted by goombah:
[b] I would agree that FFC left out the less interesting stuff from the novel. However, I would have liked to see the following from the book:
1) inserted into the beginning of the GFII film: the scene between Kay & Hagen, where Hagen is sent to bring Kay home
2) a flashback scene showing Luca Brasi killing the 6 Capone men
3) a flashback to a young Santino telling Vito that Santino witnessed his father murdering Fannucci. I would like to see Mike-Kay relationship as it was in the book. It would be more, but it would be more natural for both. The way he cut off almost everything there was between them is one of the weakest things about GF.
keep your mouth shut, and your eyes open.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50141
01/25/05 05:42 PM
01/25/05 05:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 99
Ireland
Martin Sbalzi
Button
|
Button
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 99
Ireland
|
Originally posted by Rudik:
I have read The Godfather 3 times now. And what I notice about Puzo that he is too detailed. Not enough dialogue. Tell me if I am wrong. I don't see how any book can be too detailed. If anything, it makes the story much better to read because you can imagine what the scenery is like. The dialogue seem perfect for me. The only part I disliked about The Godfather was Book II, where Johnny Fontane was given $20, 000, 000 to produce a movie. It seems boring and carried on for quite a bit.
È la paura che tiene ci fedele.
|
|
|
Re: Godfather too Detailed?
#50142
02/24/05 03:39 PM
02/24/05 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 711
Scotland
Debz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 711
Scotland
|
I agree I found some Johnny Fontane and Lucy parts on the novel quite dull aswell...I dont know if it was the fact that they were not covered so much in the film...or probably because they didn't seem to have much point to them  I watched the film before reading the book...so i had the images playing in my head as i was reading it..its a brilliant book tho no questions asked lol
[Debz]
|
|
|
|
. And he changed many things in the original novel he'd better leave as they were. So I definitely prefer the book, the skipped wersion without Fontane-Mancini parts 
