GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (BugsyM), 321 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,491
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,285
Hollander 23,923
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,512
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,333
Posts1,058,812
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Unions under 5 family control #701516
03/07/13 11:34 PM
03/07/13 11:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
We all know mafia infiltration in the Unions isn't as prevalent anymore and that's a good thing. But they are still there in some of them and probably won't ever be completely. For conversations sake, if anyone has any info on Unions that we KNOW to be under sway of the five families please share. One example I can think of is ILA local 1235 has been Genovese run for years and Carpenters Union 608. Any others for the Gambino's, Lucchese's, Bonanno's and Colombo's?

Last edited by 123JoeSchmo; 03/07/13 11:35 PM.

"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701521
03/08/13 12:40 AM
03/08/13 12:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
These are the unions, etc. the NY families have been involved with in cases since 2000.


Genovese Family
Carpenters Union Local 11, 20, 45, 157, 608, 926, 964
New York District Council of Carpenters
Association of Wall-Ceiling & Carpentry Industries
Amalgamated Carpenters and Joiners Union
Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons Union Local 530, 780
Operative Plasterers & Cement Workers Union Local 780
International Union of Journeyman & Allied Trades Local 124, 713
International Union of Operating Engineers Locals 14, 15
United Union of Roofers, Water Proofers & Allied Workers Local 8
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Union Local 7
International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 1
Elecrical Workers Union Local 3
Teamsters Local 701, 813, 1181
ILA Local 824, 1235, 1478, 1588, 1804-1, 1922, 1922-1, 2062
Metropolitan Marine Maintenance Contractors Association
United Food & Commerical Workers Union Local 348, 1262
Bakery, Confectionary, and Tobacco Workers Union Local 102
Building Service Workers Union Local 32 B/J
Novelty and Production Workers Union Local 148
Laborers Local 734
HEREU Local 69
New York Central Labor Council


Gambino Family
Laborers Local 79, 325, 731, 1018, 1153
International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14, 825
Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters Local 638
Teamsters Union Local 282, 854
ILA Local 1, 1814
United Plant & Production Workers Union Local 175
Building Service Workers Union Local 32 B/J
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 305
New York Sanitation Department


Lucchese Family
Laborers Local 20, 29, 66, 79
Carpenters Local 608
Bricklayers Local 1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825
Teamsters Local 806, 282
New York Department of Buildings
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 348
Communication Workers Local 14170


Colombo Family
International Union of Operating Engineers Locals 14, 15, 137
Laborers Local 6A
Teamsters Local 282
Production Workers Union Local 400


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701523
03/08/13 12:44 AM
03/08/13 12:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Thanks Ivy as always. Do you know anything about how many of these Unions are still under mob sway?


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701532
03/08/13 03:13 AM
03/08/13 03:13 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Thanks Ivy as always. Do you know anything about how many of these Unions are still under mob sway?


I made that list as such because all we can really do is look at recent history. Unless somebody is a fed doing the investigating, a union guy who's having to deal with the mob, or a mobster himself, there's no way to really say what's going on at present.

That said, some unions are easier to guess about then others. Only a fool would say the Genovese family doesn't still have sway over some of the ILA locals on the New Jersey waterfront or some locals in the Carpenters Union. The Amalgamated Carpenters & Joiners Union is certainly under mob control, as it was basically created by the Genovese family as a reaction to federal attacks against their control of the Carpenters Union. Certain Operating Engineers Union locals are also likely to still have mob influence, as they have been among the most mob-infested in recent years. It's also a good bet some Laborers locals are still influenced by a few of the families. After the January 2011 indictment against the Colombo's control of Laborers Local 6A, an internal FBI memo the following June claimed the Gambino and Lucchese families met to discuss a possible takeover of the local.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701536
03/08/13 04:17 AM
03/08/13 04:17 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
J
jace Offline
Suspended
jace  Offline
Suspended
J
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
I think most have been driven out. All the indictments and trials of past years had to have some effect.

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701541
03/08/13 05:15 AM
03/08/13 05:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 456
T
tiger84 Offline
Capo
tiger84  Offline
T
Capo
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 456
No bonnanos?

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: tiger84] #701566
03/08/13 11:28 AM
03/08/13 11:28 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
C
coryp Offline
Wiseguy
coryp  Offline
C
Wiseguy
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
BONNANO were not allowed, because of drug dealing..!they were gansters and said f*&^k off we do what we want..and they did

Last edited by coryp; 03/08/13 11:29 AM.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: jace] #701568
03/08/13 11:33 AM
03/08/13 11:33 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Originally Posted By: jace
I think most have been driven out. All the indictments and trials of past years had to have some effect.


Definitely not most jace. Theres still a good amount of their influence in the unions they managed to hold onto. It isn't the old days where they had a universal grip on them, but make no mistake they're still there


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701570
03/08/13 11:43 AM
03/08/13 11:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,610
In exile watching star wars an...
S
Skinny Offline
X
Skinny  Offline
X
S
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,610
In exile watching star wars an...
Who stole from like a police union pension fund? Hahahaha thats the only ways these guys can fight back

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701580
03/08/13 12:27 PM
03/08/13 12:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Who the hell robbed a police pension fund? Didn't the west side create a front for their union infiltration like Ivy siad.?


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701587
03/08/13 12:44 PM
03/08/13 12:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,610
In exile watching star wars an...
S
Skinny Offline
X
Skinny  Offline
X
S
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,610
In exile watching star wars an...
What the amalgamated such and such? Or the DOC?

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701588
03/08/13 12:55 PM
03/08/13 12:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
The amalgamated thing

Last edited by 123JoeSchmo; 03/08/13 12:58 PM.

"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701638
03/08/13 05:11 PM
03/08/13 05:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Laborers local 6A I think was taken over by the lucchese and gambino families btw


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: IvyLeague] #701642
03/08/13 05:45 PM
03/08/13 05:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,526
LuanKuci Offline
Underboss
LuanKuci  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,526
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Genovese Family
Carpenters Union Local 11, 20, 45, 157, 608, 926, 964
New York District Council of Carpenters
Association of Wall-Ceiling & Carpentry Industries
Amalgamated Carpenters and Joiners Union
Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons Union Local 530, 780
Operative Plasterers & Cement Workers Union Local 780
International Union of Journeyman & Allied Trades Local 124, 713
International Union of Operating Engineers Locals 14, 15
United Union of Roofers, Water Proofers & Allied Workers Local 8
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Union Local 7
International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 1
Elecrical Workers Union Local 3
Teamsters Local 701, 813, 1181
ILA Local 824, 1235, 1478, 1588, 1804-1, 1922, 1922-1, 2062
Metropolitan Marine Maintenance Contractors Association
United Food & Commerical Workers Union Local 348, 1262
Bakery, Confectionary, and Tobacco Workers Union Local 102
Building Service Workers Union Local 32 B/J
Novelty and Production Workers Union Local 148
Laborers Local 734
HEREU Local 69
New York Central Labor Council


Wow...and we still wonder why they are #1.
Can't imagine the cash these unions put into their pockets.

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701648
03/08/13 06:01 PM
03/08/13 06:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,425
Bamboo Lounge
NickyEyes1 Offline
Hawks Bears Bulls Sox
NickyEyes1  Offline
Hawks Bears Bulls Sox
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,425
Bamboo Lounge
Yeah where are the Bonannos? They have to have at least a couple union's

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701670
03/08/13 07:12 PM
03/08/13 07:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: Skinny
Who stole from like a police union pension fund? Hahahaha thats the only ways these guys can fight back


That was the Colombos, including Frank Persico, back in the big June 2001 case that charged members and associates of all the NY families. They were using kickbacks to skim from te Detective’s Endowment Association, as well as Production Workers Local 400 and Operating Engineers Local 137.

Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
The amalgamated thing


Amalgamated Carpenters & Joiners Union

Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Laborers local 6A I think was taken over by the lucchese and gambino families btw


As I said above, the FBI memo said a representative from the Gambino family met with a Lucchese captain and some soldiers to discuss taking it over. I guess time will tell if it happened or not.

Originally Posted By: NickyEyes1
Yeah where are the Bonannos? They have to have at least a couple union's


Most of the Bonanno family's union involvement didn't continue past the 1960's, which coincidentally enough, was when Joe Bonanno was kicked out and the family had a lot of internal problems. From then on, the family always seemed to be on the outside as far as the unions, including ones involving multiple families, were concerned. The only exceptions were Teamsters Local 814 (the Movers Union) , which they lost control of after an indictment came down in the 1980's, and the rackets they had at the NY Post, which included the union that represented the newspaper delivery drivers. In recent years, the Bonannos have had some involvement with a few construction companies here and there but really nothing to do with the unions themselves.

Last edited by IvyLeague; 03/08/13 07:14 PM.

Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701672
03/08/13 07:18 PM
03/08/13 07:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
J
jace Offline
Suspended
jace  Offline
Suspended
J
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Originally Posted By: jace
I think most have been driven out. All the indictments and trials of past years had to have some effect.


Definitely not most jace. Theres still a good amount of their influence in the unions they managed to hold onto. It isn't the old days where they had a universal grip on them, but make no mistake they're still there


They are still there, but union membership is more aware of any influence, and unlike older times, more willing to come forward and complain. The influence is much less than 1970-1990 time period.

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: coryp] #701685
03/08/13 07:46 PM
03/08/13 07:46 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
J
jace Offline
Suspended
jace  Offline
Suspended
J
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,590
Originally Posted By: coryp
BONNANO were not allowed, because of drug dealing..!they were gansters and said f*&^k off we do what we want..and they did



I find that very believable. Were they also kept out of commission meetings?

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: jace] #701689
03/08/13 08:02 PM
03/08/13 08:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: jace
I find that very believable. Were they also kept out of commission meetings?


No, they still had a seat on the Commission after Joe Bonanno was kicked out but it seems they were squeezed out of the labor union rackets, which included a lot of joint-family operations. The Bonannos lost their seat on the Commission in 1979, albeit temporarily of course. Their excessive involvement in narcotics may have been one reason but, according to Jerry Capeci, it had more to do with the family not being unified and the much disputed reign of Carmine Galante. The revelation a couple years later of Pistone infiltrating the family didn't help either. The family didn't regain it's seat until the 1990's when Massino became boss.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701691
03/08/13 08:10 PM
03/08/13 08:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Massino have any unions? What the hell made him so powerful?


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: jace] #701696
03/08/13 08:19 PM
03/08/13 08:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,185
B
bronx Offline
Underboss
bronx  Offline
B
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,185
brasco was the big thing after joe b tried to take over..no commission voting..

Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701726
03/08/13 10:29 PM
03/08/13 10:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
Massino have any unions? What the hell made him so powerful?


No, he didn't. In fact, he even made the remark that "We (the Bonannos) really have nothing to do with the unions or construction."

Ironically, the Bonanno family's lack of involvement in the unions protected them. It spared them being caught up in a number of labor racketeering cases that involved the other families working together. And, of course, the Bonanno also benefited from the FBI not considering them a big priority. In the early 1990's, the Bonanno and Colombo squads were combined and the Bonannos had about a decade of relatively little FBI pressure. This enabled them to regroup and rebuild.

At one point, he was considered the top boss but that was only because he was the only official boss left on the street. That's why he chaired that Commission meeting. Not because he had more clout than Chin, Gotti, Amuso, or Persico.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701727
03/08/13 11:04 PM
03/08/13 11:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
So what exactly did the bonannos do if they didn't have anything to do with unions or construction? That's where a great majority of the families get their money even the Colombos


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701730
03/09/13 12:09 AM
03/09/13 12:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: 123JoeSchmo
So what exactly did the bonannos do if they didn't have anything to do with unions or construction? That's where a great majority of the families get their money even the Colombos


Contrary to what some have been saying here, sports betting is still the mob's #1 money maker over all. The Bonannos didn't have any union involvement but they were and are major players in the traditional rackets - gambling, loansharking, extortion, drug trafficking, etc. They were also big into new things like stock fraud, though Massino kept the family from becoming involved in the gas tax scam.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701735
03/09/13 12:35 AM
03/09/13 12:35 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
1
123JoeSchmo Offline OP
Underboss
123JoeSchmo  Offline OP
1
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,769
Massachusetts, USA
Thanks to Massino however the Bonanno's fell from grace once more. I wonder how they keep it all together with their hierarchy getting pinched all the time


"Don't ever go against the family again. Ever"- Michael Corleone
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: 123JoeSchmo] #701754
03/09/13 06:26 AM
03/09/13 06:26 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Since 2000...


Genovese Family
8 administration members indicted
23 captains or acting captains indicted
45 soldiers indicted


Gambino Family
8 administration members indicted
27 captains or acting captains indicted
59 soldiers indicted


Lucchese Family
5 administration members indicted
12 captains or acting captains indicted
29 soldiers indicted


Colombo Family
12 administration members indicted
10 captains or acting captains indicted
17 soldiers indicted


Bonanno Family
11 administration members indicted
25 captains or acting captains indicted
38 soldiers indicted


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: jace] #701815
03/09/13 03:05 PM
03/09/13 03:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
pizzaboy Offline
The Fuckin Doctor
pizzaboy  Offline
The Fuckin Doctor

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
Originally Posted By: jace
They are still there, but union membership is more aware of any influence, and unlike older times, more willing to come forward and complain. The influence is much less than 1970-1990 time period.

That's a fair statement. The '70s thru the early '90s were the "Golden Age" of union corruption. They're still there, and always will be to a degree, but the federal mandates have made it much tougher.


"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: pizzaboy] #701848
03/09/13 06:10 PM
03/09/13 06:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
That's a fair statement. The '70s thru the early '90s were the "Golden Age" of union corruption. They're still there, and always will be to a degree, but the federal mandates have made it much tougher.


You don't think the 1950's and 1960's would fit into that "Golden Age?"


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: IvyLeague] #701950
03/10/13 02:15 PM
03/10/13 02:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
pizzaboy Offline
The Fuckin Doctor
pizzaboy  Offline
The Fuckin Doctor

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
That's a fair statement. The '70s thru the early '90s were the "Golden Age" of union corruption. They're still there, and always will be to a degree, but the federal mandates have made it much tougher.


You don't think the 1950's and 1960's would fit into that "Golden Age?"

Of course, Ivy. It's just that Jace specifically mentioned the '70s thru the '90s, so that's how I replied smile.

But now that you mention it, it does bring the Teamsters to mind (you know it always does with me). Many people believe (myself included) that the Teamsters were even more corrupt under Fitzimmons than they were under Hoffa. And Fitz did fit that time frame (the late '60s thru the early '80s).

And for the record, Jackie Presser (who served as President for most of the '80s) was no Saint, either. That guy was some piece of fucking work, believe me when I tell you wink.


"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
Re: Unions under 5 family control [Re: pizzaboy] #702013
03/10/13 08:11 PM
03/10/13 08:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
I
IvyLeague Offline
IvyLeague  Offline
I

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
But now that you mention it, it does bring the Teamsters to mind (you know it always does with me). Many people believe (myself included) that the Teamsters were even more corrupt under Fitzimmons than they were under Hoffa. And Fitz did fit that time frame (the late '60s thru the early '80s).


Oh, absolutely. From what I've read, Fitzimmons knew his place and was the classic "yes man." I always got the impression that Hoffa was harder to control and had an uneasy partnership with the mob; and only because he had to. It's no mystery why they didn't want Hoffa taking over again.

Quote:
And for the record, Jackie Presser (who served as President for most of the '80s) was no Saint, either. That guy was some piece of fucking work, believe me when I tell you wink.


Regarding Presser, there's a very good book from his former assistant called Devil's Pact: Inside the World of the Teamsters Union.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™