GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
2 registered members (2 invisible), 227 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,467
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,285
Hollander 23,884
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,512
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,324
Posts1,058,607
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Vito's return to Sicily #699355
02/24/13 06:02 PM
02/24/13 06:02 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline OP
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
We've talked about this before, but I would like to add something else to the discussion as to why Vito returned earlier than 1927; no signs of fascism.

Mussonlini had sent his prefect, Cesare Mori, to Sicily in 1925 with the objective of destroying the Mafia. So it would be a very risky and dangerous decision for Vito to return to Sicily while the Sicilian Mafia was in the midst of being eradicated. Especially considering that Vito himself was planning on killing a Mafia boss and his hench men. Second, in those scenes, if I remember correctly, we don't see any sign of fascism, no posters, no flags, no "blackshirts", no nothing. I think that by then, when the Fascists were trying to purify Sicily of the Mafia, fascism would have been visible in Sicily as well.

And not to mention ofcourse the little boy Michael, who could have been no older than three years old, certainly not sevens years old.

So in case you didn't know already, imo Vito's return in 1927 would be absolutely out of the question. FFC's own notes include that Vito returned in 1922 or 1923, depending on Peter Cowie or Harlan Lebo. Also, the original trailer of Part II specifically states that Vito returned in 1921. So I think the person who created the timeline should be hanged, or at the very least tortured for a couple of hours. What was he thinking?


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: Vito's return to Sicily [Re: Sonny_Black] #699715
02/25/13 09:17 PM
02/25/13 09:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,512
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,512
AZ
Sonny, if wrong timelines were a capital offense, half the GF fans and writers in the world would have been executed. lol


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: Vito's return to Sicily [Re: Sonny_Black] #699835
02/26/13 03:57 AM
02/26/13 03:57 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 65
G
GabbyBM Offline
Button
GabbyBM  Offline
G
Button
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 65
Turnbull, i think there's an app for that.

I think 1924 is more realistic in relation to Michael's age as well, if he were about 21 when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on Pops' birthday in 1941 (Timeline has him born in 1920). If Michael were about three years old in the Sicily scenes then we're looking at around 1923, I suppose.

Re: Vito's return to Sicily [Re: Turnbull] #699930
02/26/13 03:03 PM
02/26/13 03:03 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline OP
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
Sonny, if wrong timelines were a capital offense, half the GF fans and writers in the world would have been executed. lol


It would result in a witch hunt. lol


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™