|
1 registered members (Malavita),
187
guests, and 5
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,341
Posts1,058,948
Members10,349
| |
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: jonnynonos]
#680855
12/04/12 06:22 PM
12/04/12 06:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
ricobenes
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
|
Really? So it's your opinion that Mike Magnificci is a "caporegime" ?
It's your opinion that Frank and Nick Calabrese were mere "soldiers?"
You guys are utterly delusional.
Like I said: Show me a reputable news article or a police report of recent activity backing up your claim or begin each claim with "I am in love with the idea of a powerful Outfit and as such I would like to believe XXX." I could give a fuck how powerful the outfit is. No one said the chart was 100% correct. And yes, the Calabrese bros were high level Chinatown soldiers. What would lead you to believe otherwise?
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: jonnynonos]
#680875
12/04/12 06:43 PM
12/04/12 06:43 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
ricobenes
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
|
As opposed to what? Your street knowledge? No offense but no one is going to tell you over drinks at Richard's Bar that the Outfit is involved in major drug and arms trafficking operations, are they?
That seems to be what you're implying.
That inside people with real knowledge of the situation have give you the inside deets.
I will assume that it is just your imagination run wild. Othewise why don't you share with us where you get your information. Even if it's not a specific indivicual name, just say "a cousin of a high ranking mobster" etc.
When did I imply that some shitbag at Richards feeds me info? I honestly could care less about what you, or anyone else thinks. We both know that the bulk of your info comes from Dane placko, ipsn.org, and a bunch of dusty old news articles, that much was apparent when you expressed sympathy for that dirtbag Calabrese jr & admitted to believing Joe batters was the top boss for decades, so what's the difference? Eyes, PP, friedravfarts, and myself just come here to bullshit once in a while, no one is trying to convince anyone of anything. And frankly, its no ones business where i get my information from. That's private, and once again, I'm not sharing anything specific, nor detrimental, so again, what's the difference? Believe what you'd like, means absolutely nothing to me.
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: jonnynonos]
#680882
12/04/12 06:50 PM
12/04/12 06:50 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
ricobenes
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
|
In general you can't disprove a negative.
Anyway, to answer the original question, here are the 28 members. I actually copied this from one of Ivy League's old posts.
1. Joseph Andriacchi
2. Dominic Basso
3. Robert Bellavia
4. Frank Calabrese
5. Bruno Caruso
6. Frank Caruso
7. Leo Caruso
8. Marco D'Amico
9. John DiFronzo
10. Joseph DiFronzo
11. Peter M. DiFronzo
12. Salvatore DeLaurentis
13. Rudolph Fratto
14. Michael Gurgone
15. James Inendino
16. Joseph Frank LaMantia
17. Joseph Lombardo
18. Rocco Lombardo
19. Michael Magnifichi
20. James Marcello
21. Louis Marino
22. John Matassa
23. Salvatore Muserino
24. Albert Roverio
25. Michael Spano Sr.
26. John Eugene Spizzirri
27. Richard Allen Spizzirri
28. Michael C. Talarico That list is a joke, and ivyleague is completely clueless. Nothing new there though. Please, ignore me, I would like that very much.
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: ricobenes]
#680884
12/04/12 06:51 PM
12/04/12 06:51 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,627
Underground
Toodoped
Murder Ink
|
Murder Ink
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,627
Underground
|
As opposed to what? Your street knowledge? No offense but no one is going to tell you over drinks at Richard's Bar that the Outfit is involved in major drug and arms trafficking operations, are they?
That seems to be what you're implying.
That inside people with real knowledge of the situation have give you the inside deets.
I will assume that it is just your imagination run wild. Othewise why don't you share with us where you get your information. Even if it's not a specific indivicual name, just say "a cousin of a high ranking mobster" etc.
When did I imply that some shitbag at Richards feeds me info? I honestly could care less about what you, or anyone else thinks. We both know that the bulk of your info comes from Dane placko, ipsn.org, and a bunch of dusty old news articles, that much was apparent when you expressed sympathy for that dirtbag Calabrese jr & admitted to believing Joe batters was the top boss for decades, so what's the difference? Eyes, PP, friedravfarts, and myself just come here to bullshit once in a while, no one is trying to convince anyone of anything. And frankly, its no ones business where i get my information from. That's private, and once again, I'm not sharing anything specific, nor detrimental, so again, what's the difference? Believe what you'd like, means absolutely nothing to me. But sometimes you like to say that ppl are lost,and "these facts are not true",and this and that,and after that "I'm not sharing anything specific" or "Believe what you'd like, means absolutely nothing to me. " bla bla bla bla...aaahhhhh shut up!!!youre a nice fello!stay cool to the ladies.theres a lot of this gay menace thing goin on and we dont need that shit right now!!!  last glass of mr.jack and im off!cheers yall 
He who can never endure the bad will never see the good
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: Toodoped]
#680889
12/04/12 06:57 PM
12/04/12 06:57 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
ricobenes
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 187
|
As opposed to what? Your street knowledge? No offense but no one is going to tell you over drinks at Richard's Bar that the Outfit is involved in major drug and arms trafficking operations, are they?
That seems to be what you're implying.
That inside people with real knowledge of the situation have give you the inside deets.
I will assume that it is just your imagination run wild. Othewise why don't you share with us where you get your information. Even if it's not a specific indivicual name, just say "a cousin of a high ranking mobster" etc.
When did I imply that some shitbag at Richards feeds me info? I honestly could care less about what you, or anyone else thinks. We both know that the bulk of your info comes from Dane placko, ipsn.org, and a bunch of dusty old news articles, that much was apparent when you expressed sympathy for that dirtbag Calabrese jr & admitted to believing Joe batters was the top boss for decades, so what's the difference? Eyes, PP, friedravfarts, and myself just come here to bullshit once in a while, no one is trying to convince anyone of anything. And frankly, its no ones business where i get my information from. That's private, and once again, I'm not sharing anything specific, nor detrimental, so again, what's the difference? Believe what you'd like, means absolutely nothing to me. But sometimes you like to say that ppl are lost,and "these facts are not true",and this and that,and after that "I'm not sharing anything specific" or "Believe what you'd like, means absolutely nothing to me. " bla bla bla bla...aaahhhhh shut up!!!youre a nice fello!stay cool to the ladies.theres a lot of this gay menace thing goin on and we dont need that shit right now!!! last glass of mr.jack and im off!cheers yall my brain just exploded.
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: NickyEyes1]
#680905
12/04/12 07:08 PM
12/04/12 07:08 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
gamms
Was: sitonmyface11
|
Was: sitonmyface11
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
|
So johnnynonnos, if the outfit is so small today and almost defunct, then why do they have CASINOS IN ARUBA? I think most small families don't have that. nick, one associate who owns a casino is not the same ad having a casino on the strip paid for with a teamster loan and skimmed from. patsy conte owns key foods. that doesnt mean the gambinos control the supermarkets in the city. just my two cents.
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: NickyEyes1]
#680913
12/04/12 07:14 PM
12/04/12 07:14 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
gamms
Was: sitonmyface11
|
Was: sitonmyface11
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
|
kid no offense,but that makes as much sense as saying, you must be a madeguy because no one has any proof that your not one. long story short, the 'dusty news articles' are going to be right over some random fella on the internet ninety percent of the time. there are guys who can tell us who is made in chicago and who aint.and ricobenes isnt one of them. carmela already caught him in one lie.
|
|
|
Re: Chicago Outfit: The 28 members
[Re: NickyEyes1]
#680915
12/04/12 07:16 PM
12/04/12 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
gamms
Was: sitonmyface11
|
Was: sitonmyface11
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
|
you don't think the outfit is getting anything from it?
And is Posner even an Italian last name?
maybe comp rooms and maybe a airplane ticket, but more than that?
|
|
|
|
