GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Toodoped), 67 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 67,618
DE NIRO 44,945
J Geoff 31,285
Hollander 24,164
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,518
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,387
Posts1,059,817
Members10,349
Most Online796
Jan 21st, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
The definitive timeline #669108
10/06/12 03:26 AM
10/06/12 03:26 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 95
United States
Hisenberg Offline OP
Button
Hisenberg  Offline OP
Button
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 95
United States
Here is the definitive timeline for the three movies,


18??
Antonio Andolini is born in Sicily.
Antonio's future wife is born in Sicily.
1887
Paolo Andolini is born to Antonio and his wife in Sicily.
1891
Vito Andolini is born to Antonio and his wife in Sicily.[nb 1]
Hyman Roth is born.
1897
Carmela Corleone is born.
1900
Don Altobello is born.
1901
Antonio is killed on the orders of Don Francesco Ciccio.
Paolo is gunned down during Antonio's funeral.
Antonio's wife is shot to death while attempting to avenge Antonio and Paolo's murder.
Vito immigrates to the United States.
1910
Johnny Fontane is born.
Tom Hagen is born.
1914
Vito and Carmela marry.
1916
Sonny is born to Vito and Carmela.
1918
Sandra is born.
1919
Fredo is born to Vito and Carmela.
1920
Prohibition begins.
Theresa Hagen is born.
Michael Corleone is born to Vito and Carmela.
Vito murders Massimo Fanucci.
1923
Connie is born to Vito and Carmela.[nb 2]
Vito returns to Sicily to avenge his family's murder and kills Don Ciccio.
1924
Kay Adams is born to a Baptist pastor and his wife in New Hampshire.
1933
Prohibition ends.
The Olive Oil War between Salvatore Maranzano and Vito Corleone begins.
Maranzano is killed on Vito's orders by Salvatore Tessio and his men.[nb 3]
1934
Vito survives an assassination attempt by Irish hoodlums.
Giuseppe Mariposa is killed by Salvatore Tessio on the orders of Vito.[nb 3]
Vito begins the Pacification of New York.
1935
Sonny and Sandra marry.
1937
Francesca and Kathryn are born to Sonny and Sandra Corleone.
Johnny is released from a personal services contract by his bandleader, Les Halley.
1939
Vito and his family moves to a compound in Long Beach.
World War II begins.
1940
Frank is born to Tom and Theresa Hagen.
Frank is born to Sonny and Sandra Corleone.
1941
Japan attack the United States at Pearl Harbor.
Michael enlists in the United States Marine Corps.
1942
Andrew is born to Tom and Theresa Hagen.
1944
Michael is awarded the Navy Cross and is pictured in Life Magazine.
1945
Santino, Jr. is born to Sonny and Sandra.
Kay commences an affair with Michael.
World War II ends.
Carlo and Connie marry.
Tom becomes Vito's consigliere after Genco dies.
Vito is severely wounded in an assassination attempt by Virgil Sollozzo and the Tattaglia family.
Sonny takes charge of family affairs.
1946
Michael murders Sollozzo and Mark McCluskey and flees to Sicily.
The Five Families War begins.
1947
Michael and Apollonia marry.
1948
Sonny is brutally massacred by enemies of the family.[nb 4]
Apollonia is killed in a car-bomb explosion due to the treachery of Fabrizio.
Vincent is born to Sonny and Lucy.
Michael returns to New York from Sicily.
1949
Victor is born to Carlo and Connie.
1950
Michael reunites with Kay.
1951
Michael and Kay marry.
Anthony is born to Michael and Kay.
1953
Mary is born to Michael and Kay.
1954
Michael assumes control of family business interests, with the blessing of Vito.
1955
Michael Francis is born to Carlo and Connie.
Vito dies of natural causes.
Michael becomes Don.
Michael eliminates most of his mobster foes and moves from Long Beach to Lake Tahoe, Nevada.[nb 5]
Carlo is garroted by Peter Clemenza on Michael's orders.
1957
Fredo and Deanna Dunn marry.
1958
Peter Clemenza dies.
Connie seeks Michael's permission to marry Merle Johnson.
Michael survives an assassination attempt at his Lake Tahoe mansion, orchestrated by Hyman Roth.
Michael does business in Cuba.
1959
Michael is summoned to appear before a subcommittee of the Senate.
Kay separates from Michael.
Al Neri kills Fredo at Lake Tahoe at the behest of Michael.
1960
Hyman Roth is killed by Rocco Lampone.[nb 6]
1976
Michael moves back to New York.
1979
Michael receives the Order of St. Sebastian.
Vincent enters the Corleone family circle.
Vincent saves Michael from an assassination attempt in Atlantic City, orchestrated by Joey Zasa and Don Altobello.
Joey Zasa is killed by Vincent.
1980
Vincent becomes Michael's heir.
Anthony has his opera debut at Teatro Massimo in Palermo, Sicily.
Connie poisons Don Altobello.
Mary is murdered as she leaves the opera house with Michael.
1997
Michael dies.

Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Hisenberg] #669126
10/06/12 09:42 AM
10/06/12 09:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
Danito Offline
Underboss
Danito  Offline
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,718
Berlin, Germany
Thanks for the work.
But why do you call this timeline definitive? Definitive according to who or what?
There are a lot of contradictions:
- within the novel (e.g. return of Michael)
- between novel and film(s) (e.g. massacre)
- between GF and GF2 (e.g. birth of Vito)

Some events aren't mentioned at all. How can you tell the year of Fredo's wedding?

Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Danito] #669158
10/06/12 12:14 PM
10/06/12 12:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
Exactly. Even we who have persistently rummaged through the novel and films can't be definitive. How can he?


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Danito] #669159
10/06/12 12:15 PM
10/06/12 12:15 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: Danito
Thanks for the work.
But why do you call this timeline definitive? Definitive according to who or what?
There are a lot of contradictions:
- within the novel (e.g. return of Michael)
- between novel and film(s) (e.g. massacre)
- between GF and GF2 (e.g. birth of Vito)

Some events aren't mentioned at all. How can you tell the year of Fredo's wedding?


He got this timeline over here where it includes notes about those contradictions.

http://godfather.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669166
10/06/12 12:35 PM
10/06/12 12:35 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
One glaring error in the above timeline is the age difference between Tom Hagen and Sonny. They were the same age.

I know there is a difference between the novel and the movie over when they were born (the novel says 1910; the movie suggests 1916), but, again, they were the same age even if the timeline says they were six years apart.


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669168
10/06/12 12:50 PM
10/06/12 12:50 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: SC
One glaring error in the above timeline is the age difference between Tom Hagen and Sonny. They were the same age.

I know there is a difference between the novel and the movie over when they were born (the novel says 1910; the movie suggests 1916), but, again, they were the same age even if the timeline says they were six years apart.


True, but the only source that states Hagen's age is the novel.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669170
10/06/12 12:52 PM
10/06/12 12:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
There is no such thing as a "definitive" timeline because of all the contradictions and errors in the films and in the novel. I tried to do part of a timeline on Michael's Sicilian sojourn here:

http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/ubbthr...true#Post580389
...I cited page numbers and direct quotes, but even that was contradicted by other passages in the novel. It's just all over the place.

Also, Hisenberg, if you're cutting and pasting from another source, you should identify the source. It's their intellectual property.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669173
10/06/12 01:07 PM
10/06/12 01:07 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
True, but the only source that states Hagen's age is the novel.


The novel also specifically states that Hagen and Sonny were the same age.


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669175
10/06/12 01:14 PM
10/06/12 01:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
Right:

"At the age of eleven he had been a playmate of eleven-year-old Sonny Corleone."


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669184
10/06/12 02:30 PM
10/06/12 02:30 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
True, but the only source that states Hagen's age is the novel.


The novel also specifically states that Hagen and Sonny were the same age.


The novel makes a lot of specifications, like Vito being 25 in 1919 en then being sixty during the Dons meeting, contradicting his age. Also, the novel later states Sonny was sixteen in 1933.

According to Part II, Sonny was born in 1916, so we can assume Tom was too.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669186
10/06/12 02:48 PM
10/06/12 02:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
True, but the only source that states Hagen's age is the novel.

The novel also specifically states that Hagen and Sonny were the same age.

The novel makes a lot of specifications, like Vito being 25 in 1919 en then being sixty during the Dons meeting, contradicting his age. Also, the novel later states Sonny was sixteen in 1933.

According to Part II, Sonny was born in 1916, so we can assume Tom was too.


I assume you have a point. What is it?

Mine is the above timeline is wrong about the fact that Tom is six years older than Sonny.


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669188
10/06/12 03:07 PM
10/06/12 03:07 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: SC
I assume you have a point. What is it?

Mine is the above timeline is wrong about the fact that Tom is six years older than Sonny.


My point is that the novel has numerous inconsistenties about character ages and should therefore be taken with a huge pine of salt when it comes to establishing an accurate timeline.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669189
10/06/12 03:12 PM
10/06/12 03:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
My point is that the novel has numerous inconsistenties about character ages and should therefore be taken with a huge pine of salt when it comes to establishing an accurate timeline.


So you don't think that Tom and Sonny are the same age as is stated in the novel? You are skeptical of that?


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669192
10/06/12 03:48 PM
10/06/12 03:48 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
My point is that the novel has numerous inconsistenties about character ages and should therefore be taken with a huge pine of salt when it comes to establishing an accurate timeline.


So you don't think that Tom and Sonny are the same age as is stated in the novel? You are skeptical of that?


I'm saying that if they're the same age, then both are born in 1916 rather than 1910. I think it's kind of ridiculous that Sonny would be born in 1910, Fredo in 1915, Michael in 1920 and Connie some years later. We are to believe that Vito and Carmela only got together every five years? Or did Carmela have numerous misscarrieges in between?


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669193
10/06/12 03:51 PM
10/06/12 03:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
I'm saying that if they're the same age, then both are born in 1916 rather than 1910.


OK. Regardless of in what year they were born we agree that the timeline above is wrong .... and that is all I was saying.


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669195
10/06/12 04:03 PM
10/06/12 04:03 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: SC
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
I'm saying that if they're the same age, then both are born in 1916 rather than 1910.


OK. Regardless of in what year they were born we agree that the timeline above is wrong .... and that is all I was saying.


It's impossible to establish a perfectly accurate timeline because of the numerous inconsistenties in the novel and even the films. The novel states that Tom was 35 in 1945 and Sonny of the same age. Later on the novel states that Sonny was sixteen in 1933. You see where I'm getting at? One has to make choices in creating a timeline based on personal preferences. Puzo and Coppola never offered us a consistent timeline in the first place.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Hisenberg] #669197
10/06/12 04:42 PM
10/06/12 04:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
All I know "for sure" is that the massacre took place in '51 (a little bird told me).

However, the timeline is all over the place no matter which source one uses. Maybe Puzo and FFC conspired to keep us dissecting the novel and th film 40+ years later.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: olivant] #669209
10/06/12 05:54 PM
10/06/12 05:54 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: olivant
However, the timeline is all over the place no matter which source one uses. Maybe Puzo and FFC conspired to keep us dissecting the novel and th film 40+ years later.


You nailed it. Illuminati.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: olivant] #669238
10/06/12 09:37 PM
10/06/12 09:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Originally Posted By: olivant
All I know "for sure" is that the massacre took place in '51 (a little bird told me).

However, the timeline is all over the place no matter which source one uses. Maybe Puzo and FFC conspired to keep us dissecting the novel and th film 40+ years later.

Oli, the reason I did the timeline for the novel was that the "little bird" in the film was Sonny's car radio playing the Dodgers/Giants final playoff game in October 1951. My reason for doing the timeline was my belief that the Five Families War couldn't have gone on for nearly five years--thus Michael had to have returned from Sicily way before that. Also, Sonny would have been driving a 10-year-old car when he got whacked.

I made a case for Michael's early return based on quotes from the novel, putting his return either in late '46 or early '47, in several scenarios. But then you pointed out that, if Michael did return that early, he'd have had to be Vito's apprentice for eight or nine years, given that Vito died in 1955 (film). That would be as unlikely as my original premise: that the war couldn't have lasted nearly five years.

All I can say is what you and I said earlier in this thread: it's impossible to reconstruct a definitive timeline for either the films or the novel. And thank you very much, Mario Puzo, for giving us this opportunity to bang our heads against the wall. tongue


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Turnbull] #669243
10/06/12 10:38 PM
10/06/12 10:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
I made a case for Michael's early return based on quotes from the novel, putting his return either in late '46 or early '47, in several scenarios. But then you pointed out that, if Michael did return that early, he'd have had to be Vito's apprentice for eight or nine years, given that Vito died in 1955 (film). That would be as unlikely as my original premise: that the war couldn't have lasted nearly five years.

tongue


I agree. I think the above is what causes most of the confusion. Why would both Puzo ("It was nearly ten years since there had been such a celebration of people in the house, nearly ten years since the wedding of Constanzia ...")FFC (the headstone) chose to separate Michael's exile to Sicily from Vito's death by a decade. Most impractical. Well, as you said, thank you Puzo and FFC.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Turnbull] #669287
10/07/12 11:22 AM
10/07/12 11:22 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
if Michael did return that early, he'd have had to be Vito's apprentice for eight or nine years, given that Vito died in 1955 (film). That would be as unlikely as my original premise


I think it is not realistic that somebody, even though the son of a Mafia boss, rises to the top of boss in only a few years after becoming involved. I think eight or nine years being groomed for the top spot is perfectly normal.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669320
10/07/12 04:29 PM
10/07/12 04:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Sonny, we might be able to account for that long apprenticeship by observing (as Tom told Fredo in the scene with Moe Green) that the Don was semiretired and that Michael was in charge--that he was the day-to-day Don of the Corleone Family. And, he needed his father's prestige and his counsel.

But, realistically, Vito admitted that his agreement to protect drug trafficking at the Commission meeting was a sign of weakness. And, the novel tells us that the other Dons, and even Tess and Clem, thought Michael "lacked force." Michale himself was feigning weakness to buy time. Over a period of seven or eight years of that, the other families would have taken advantage of that passivity to reduce the Corleone holdings to insignificance. As Tess said in the "fish tank" scene: "Pretty soon I won't have a place to hang my hat."


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Hisenberg] #669322
10/07/12 05:13 PM
10/07/12 05:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
O
olivant Offline
olivant  Offline
O

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,020
Texas
Exactly TB. Also, as the novel states (yes, the novel) "It was almost three years since he had returned home ... The three years had been spent in learning the Family business."

One should also consider that waiting almost a decade to exact revenge might invite the following:
Michael and/or Vito's murder or death otherwise (his, it did)
Michael and/or Vito's incarceration
The unrecoverable denouement of the Corleone family ("The Corleone Family was definitely in decline.").
Treachery (which waiting just a few years did invite)


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: olivant] #669341
10/07/12 11:29 PM
10/07/12 11:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Originally Posted By: olivant
One should also consider that waiting almost a decade to exact revenge might invite the following:
Michael and/or Vito's murder or death otherwise (his, it did)
Treachery (which waiting just a few years did invite)

Very strong points, Oli.
When you're bleeding in the water, the shark doesn't wait for you to expire before closing in for the kill.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Turnbull] #669369
10/08/12 08:49 AM
10/08/12 08:49 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz Offline
Underboss
The Last Woltz  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted By: Turnbull
Originally Posted By: olivant
All I know "for sure" is that the massacre took place in '51 (a little bird told me).

However, the timeline is all over the place no matter which source one uses. Maybe Puzo and FFC conspired to keep us dissecting the novel and th film 40+ years later.

Oli, the reason I did the timeline for the novel was that the "little bird" in the film was Sonny's car radio playing the Dodgers/Giants final playoff game in October 1951. My reason for doing the timeline was my belief that the Five Families War couldn't have gone on for nearly five years--thus Michael had to have returned from Sicily way before that. Also, Sonny would have been driving a 10-year-old car when he got whacked.


I wouldn't read too much into the use of the audio from the Giants-Dodgers 1951 playoff game. That is one of the only (if not the only) extant long-form baseball broadcast from that era, so if FFC wanted to have Sonny listen to a baseball game, he wouldn't have had much of a choice.

Fun fact:

That broadcast is known for Giant announcer Russ Hodges's manic "The Giants win the pennant!" call. But it only survived because a Dodgers fan (one of the few people with recording equipment in 1951) taped the game with the intention of taunting Hodges and other Giants fans with it when the Dodgers won. A pivotal moment in broadcast history was preserved only because of a somewhat petty fan.


"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: olivant] #669401
10/08/12 02:08 PM
10/08/12 02:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 95
United States
Hisenberg Offline OP
Button
Hisenberg  Offline OP
Button
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 95
United States
Without any doubt the biggest contradiction in the entire timeline is the 55 massacre being said to take place in 51

This makes no sense because:

1. Vitos tombstone says 55
2. if we go by the timeline said in the second movie of the Turk killing in 47 then its saying that Michael left for Sicily, came back, married Kay, and had a 3 year old all in less then 4 years. This is pretty far fetched because we know he spent at least a year in Sicily and didn't see Kay for at least a year coming back to america

Last edited by Hisenberg; 10/08/12 02:09 PM.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Hisenberg] #669403
10/08/12 02:28 PM
10/08/12 02:28 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
Sonny_Black Offline
Underboss
Sonny_Black  Offline
Underboss
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,568
I think the reason FFC changed Sonny's death to 1948 during production was for the same reason as we've discussed, and so to make the timeline more consistent.

Puzo has Michael returning to the US in 1950 in The Sicilian.


"It was between the brothers Kay -- I had nothing to do with it."
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Hisenberg] #669404
10/08/12 02:30 PM
10/08/12 02:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Originally Posted By: Hisenberg
Without any doubt the biggest contradiction in the entire timeline is the 55 massacre being said to take place in 51


I agree 100% despite olivant's and Turnbull's protestations. Part II starts in 1958, at Anthony's first communion. He was born in 1951, and was already 3 years old reading the funny papers when Vito died. The massacre could not have been 1951.

That aside, the whole timeline is a weak, poorly written part of the movie/novel.


.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: SC] #669405
10/08/12 02:42 PM
10/08/12 02:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
But it's interesting how this thread started out with the premise of a "definitive" timeline, and then evolved into a detailed discussion of the myriad inconsistencies that make it impossible to create a definitive timeline. But that's part of the fun of being on these boards--discussions often evolve in interesting ways. smile


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: The definitive timeline [Re: Sonny_Black] #669406
10/08/12 02:44 PM
10/08/12 02:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,518
AZ
Originally Posted By: Sonny_Black
I think the reason FFC changed Sonny's death to 1948 during production was for the same reason as we've discussed, and so to make the timeline more consistent.


Sonny, some people here anchor their belief that Sonny died in '49 to the presence of a "Dewey for President" poster on a wall when Sonny beats up Carlo. But, Thomas E. Dewey, the Republican Presidential candidate in '48, also was their candidate in '44, so the poster could be part of support for an earlier date for Sonny's death.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™