2 registered members (2 invisible),
574
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,384
Posts1,059,724
Members10,349
|
Most Online796 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Re: New edition of Huck Finn
[Re: Sicilian Babe]
#590160
01/08/11 12:15 AM
01/08/11 12:15 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145 East Tennessee
ronnierocketAGO
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
|
"Huck Finn" is my daughter's favorite book. She is outraged by this.
The book put things into an historical perspective for children. Changing the book doesn't change the past, and people need to recognize that there was a time in our country's past when people were bought and sold like dogs and cats. They were referred to in a way that is shameful. You can't whitewash (no pun intended) the past, or a book. Nevermind that for its time, Huck Finn was rather progressive in the very department its currently getting the Kremlin treatment over. No not suitable for 2010, but art in itself is dated, that is part of the appeal. How about we tackle Oliver Twist next and cut out the anti-semitism? This reminds me of the 17th-19th centuries when Shakespeare's plays were censored, truncated, or just outright rewritten because no way "The Bard" was allowed his naughty puns. Romeo & Juliet and King Lear (among others) didn't just perform on stage with happy endings, people expected them.
|
|
|
|