I dunno if its just me but my opinion is that there cannot be another godfather without pacino in it and if you recall he dies in the third one so i don't think they should make another

If you check out the Godfather IV forum, you'll see that many, MANY scenarios have been suggested, including covering the years in between Mary's death and Michael's. So in that case, there would be some part for Pacino to play.

However, if Pacino has any brains he would NEVER agree to appear in another Godfather film, if FFC has any brains he will never make one, and I agree with you DannyMontana that they should not make another. Ever.

Best,
Apple

Amen to that.

Amen to that.

Yes, absolutely! Even though we all love THe Godfather movies it would just taint them if they made another one!

Like GF III did. It was a resolution but still, I do with out it if I marathon watch it.

well i think alot of you just misunderstood part three. it wasn't as bad as you say it was, if you were true fans you'd see the only problem was sofia. otherwise nothing truly wrong with it. and why not have faith in ffc to ensure a good gf4. what if they make it and it's even better then the last ones. then you will all say what a good idea it was. tsk tsk. have faith.

Guess again.

Even if original choice Wynona Ryder had played Mary instead of non-actress Sofia, the sub-plot of incestuous love between the cousins was utterly unnecessary and a needless distraction.

Then, there was the still amazing choice of George Hamilton to play consiglieri in Robert Duvall's absence.

Oh, and how about the fabricated presence of Vincent, bastard offspring of the late Santino Corleone and his mistress Lucy...striving to inheret the position of Don Corleone from his Uncle - when there were plenty of legitimate Corleone grandchildren who could've played significant roles in the story...???

The plot revolving around the Vatican was a good one. It was nice to see as much of the original cast as possible together again (they should've paid Duvall what he asked to return).

But even if you completely omit the 'Sofia' factor - there was still plenty wrong with this film which is why it will never be even close to the level of the first two.

'True Fan' ,

AppleOnYa

I've got a carzy ass idea. What if instead of making a GF IV, FFC remakes GF III, with the key missing componets in place. (And without the cousin love.) ooh rah

Yes! No cousin love! (What the hell did it do for the story line really anyway? :rolleyes: ) But GF III wasnt all bad.It just wasnt in the same league as the other two. Its an interesting idea!

and i was starting to admire you appleonya. the fact is the george harrison didn't do anything wrong. sure he wasn't robert duvall but whose fault was that. he did an o.k. job. but he didn't really have any purpose there. the story was souly fixed on mike, vinnie, and sofia, with everyone else just there to add small plots. real fan you say you are. should i take that as you saying i am not a true fan. well i can admire part three for what it is. a labour of love, something that's better then anything else that's come out the last tweenty years. i enjoy the drama. but you being the real fan of this trilogy surly would rather trash it, the third one that is, then try and understand it. makes me wonder what a true fan you really are.

with three it just goes to show u that back then for part one and two movies back then were way better they didnt focus on intellect and things they made it more of a hot head mafia movie it was like goodfellas with a bit of a more series twist correct me if im wrong plus im high so u cant hold that against me

Originally posted by DonMerghani187

Thats nice to know. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: