I've read Roebuck's article. There is no conclusive evidence that the snitch is a terrorist from the information gleaned within. There is no concrete evidence either way; it's circumstantial. It's for the courts to decide, not the court of public opinion.

These defense lawyers are the kind of people who claim all rape victims are promiscuous and dredge up everything they can about their sexual history. They have no morals or ethics. Their only goal is to get their client off.

I do know that Narducci would be exonerated within three seconds if twelve people from this thread were on the jury.

This is why jury selection is so important!